Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 190393800008F; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:35:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1StloC-0003hJ-Cz for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 21:34:20 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1StloB-0003hA-Si for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 21:34:19 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1StloA-0001JQ-62 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 21:34:18 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q6OKYGKv005771 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 22:34:17 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q6OKYA0D024440 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 22:34:10 +0200 Message-ID: <500F063C.6050902@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 22:31:56 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <500EB973.8080005@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <500EFDFB.9060204@freenet.de> In-Reply-To: <500EFDFB.9060204@freenet.de> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Wolf, No, i think i will do the first tests tomorrow, if the WX permits. Maybe i find a place where i can leave the antenna for a day, so i can go on the next day. With my PA running a few watts and the homemade analog VFO (consuming just a few mA) it would even be possible to run an overnight test. But let's see for the first results before thinking about QSOs... [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 5c1f37c04fc013ebbc2288fd3791d043 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Pretests for the 630m band dipole Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:470168896:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408e500f07020859 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Wolf, No, i think i will do the first tests tomorrow, if the WX permits. Maybe i find a place where i can leave the antenna for a day, so i can go on the next day. With my PA running a few watts and the homemade analog VFO (consuming just a few mA) it would even be possible to run an overnight test. But let's see for the first results before thinking about QSOs... 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 24.07.2012 21:56, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf: > Hi Stefan, > > If, by chance, you are QRV with the experimental dipole tonight: > I will be at DF0WD around 20:30 UTC, watching the bats there, and make > a few calls around 472.5 kHz. > As far as I can tell from my home location, the QRN is low at the moment. > So regardless of poor 'DX' conditions it may be worth trying. > Worse conditions / high QRN level expected for the weekend. > > 73, > Wolf DL4YHF / DF0WD .