Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id AD70D38000084; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 19:07:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1St5E8-0002OM-Uw for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:06:16 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1St5E8-0002OD-HE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:06:16 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1St5E5-0000mB-D5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:06:15 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6MN6CMb012616 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 01:06:12 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q6MN6DUW014628 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 01:06:13 +0200 Message-ID: <500C86D9.80809@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 01:03:53 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <500C40DA.7080808@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <500C723E.7070409@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Am 23.07.2012 00:45, schrieb Graham: > Ok Stefan > > So a good start , may be OP32 would decode TA , we will see > during the next time ? Let's say next weekend, yes. But in summer my system performs 2 dB worse than in winther. So winther is the real test. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 896f9ee4f10c5db37812c155e804756d Subject: LF: OP32 Test ? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030405060304040108010902" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:356512480:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60cb500c87a313c7 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030405060304040108010902 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am 23.07.2012 00:45, schrieb Graham: > Ok Stefan > > So a good start , may be OP32 would decode TA , we will see > during the next time ? Let's say next weekend, yes. But in summer my system performs 2 dB worse than in winther. So winther is the real test. BTW i just got a feedback from YV7MAE who has now nearly completed his LF RX loop antenna! The loop is relatively large, about 8m^2 cross section area and has 10 turns. So he will get a nice signal. Hopefully there is not to much local QRM. If all works well, i see a chance for good S/N in Venezuela in winther. YV will then be a real challenge for your OP32 mode. Martin is a digimode fan BTW, i found his call at pskreportermap you know... 73, Stefan/DK7FC --------------030405060304040108010902 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Am 23.07.2012 00:45, schrieb Graham:
Ok Stefan 

So a good  start , may  be  OP32  would decode   TA , we  will  see  during  the  next  time  ?

Let's say next weekend, yes. But in summer my system performs 2 dB worse than in winther. So winther is the real test.

BTW i just got a feedback from YV7MAE who has now nearly completed his LF RX loop antenna! The loop is relatively large, about 8m^2 cross section area and has 10 turns. So he will get a nice signal. Hopefully there is not to much local QRM. If all works well, i see a chance for good S/N in Venezuela in winther. YV will then be a real challenge for your OP32 mode. Martin is a digimode fan BTW, i found his call at pskreportermap you know...

73, Stefan/DK7FC

--------------030405060304040108010902--