Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 955B438000094; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 18:05:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SsLJu-0001L0-Kv for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 23:05:10 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SsLJu-0001Kr-7U for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 23:05:10 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SsLJs-0001NK-Gb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 23:05:09 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6KM57mX004717 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 00:05:07 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q6KM57W1016113 for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 00:05:07 +0200 Message-ID: <5009D58A.8030508@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 00:02:50 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Graham, LF, There was a decode from UA4WPF in OP8! Unfortunately the program hung up when i attempted to control the PC via remote. So the report S/N is lost. Never mind... [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 87966b345956c8ef3389b993f6a18f4e Subject: LF: UA4WPF and G8HUH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408d5009d63d6784 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Graham, LF, There was a decode from UA4WPF in OP8! Unfortunately the program hung up when i attempted to control the PC via remote. So the report S/N is lost. Never mind... Actually i wanted to do some MF operation tonite but most often there was no answer to my CW CQ calls to that time. Seems that most OMs go to bed before the band opens (shorter groundwave range) or just want a first contact. So i have to wait for the winther time so the QSO can be done after the Tagesschau... So i spend some more time in OP8. It is nice to see so many stations there. BTW who is G8HUH? Is he member of the LF reflector (i mean the real one)? Is he a newcomer? I often thought i saw him in OP8 on my grabbe with a strong signal but obviously it was PA0A. 73, Stefan/DK7FC