Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B6E43380000A4; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 05:44:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Ss9kD-0005PA-8z for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 10:43:33 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Ss9kC-0005P1-Qo for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 10:43:32 +0100 Received: from eterpe-smout.broadpark.no ([80.202.8.16]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Ss9kA-0006AC-RD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 10:43:31 +0100 Received: from terra-smin.broadpark.no ([80.202.8.13]) by eterpe-smout.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u3-15.01 64bit (built Feb 12 2010)) with ESMTP id <0M7G003O2DOIVEB0@eterpe-smout.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:43:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.43.23] ([89.8.129.253]) by terra-smin.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u3-15.01 64bit (built Feb 12 2010)) with ESMTPA id <0M7G00MC9DOAWM52@terra-smin.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:43:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:43:28 +0200 From: Steinar Aanesland To: "*rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Message-id: <50092840.8010002@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 X-Spam-Score: 3.3 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan Is this the MFJ 259B HF antenna analyzer modification? http://www.we0h.us/Amateur_Radio_stuff/MFJ/MFJ-259B/LF-MF-Mods/ [...] Content analysis details: (3.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [80.202.8.16 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 4.0 HDRS_LCASE Odd capitalization of message header X-Scan-Signature: 4c0633a540d76adc241b9d3cede72a57 Subject: LF: MFJ 259B HF antenna analyzer modification Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:401336320:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d6019500928747f31 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Stefan Is this the MFJ 259B HF antenna analyzer modification?=20 http://www.we0h.us/Amateur_Radio_stuff/MFJ/MFJ-259B/LF-MF-Mods/ la5vna S Fra: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] P=E5 vegne av Stefan Sch= =E4fer Sendt: 19. juli 2012 01:55 Til: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Emne: Re: LF: 630 meter full size dipole Hi Jay, Interesting, thanks for the info!! Yes and that could be a real alternative for those with a small garden and a stressing XYL. The wi= re for the dipole can be quite small and fits into a backpack. Then its a question of the dependency of the antenna efficiency as a function of the ground conductivity. This will be one of the interest= ing results! 10m above ground is not much for a 630m band dipole but if the difference to 2m above the ground is just a few dB, one can easily through out the wire during taking a walk and can do some MF /p operation, without a kite, without the need for a free field, without= a tower, without a good earth (connection)... Many advantages! Maybe... BTW i have also modified (extended) the range of my MFJ 259B HF anten= na analyzer to cover MF (313...658 kHz) and LF (103...209 kHz). This modification is done very easy! I'm not sure how accurate the measurements are in that range but maybe it gives me some ideas "wher= e i am". Looking forward to that test! 73, Stefan/DK7FC Stefan =20 This may be of interest for your next exploit ... =20 Looking back in my 500 kHz log, I see that on 1/3/2010 I had a CW QSO with WD2XSH/35 in South Dakota ... who was running a full size 600 me= ter dipole. As I recall his antenna was relatively low at 30 or 40' above ground and he was running only 50 or 100 watts. His signal was weak b= ut solid copy over the few nights that he was active. Distance was 1210 = mi / 1950kM. Believe his antenna was 'out in the open' as he apparently owns a good sized farm. =20 Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 =20 =20