Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 424F438000091; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 15:53:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SraIh-0005u8-67 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 20:52:47 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SraIg-0005tz-O4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 20:52:46 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SraIe-0004tv-Qw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 20:52:45 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q6IJqfsL010553 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 21:52:42 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q6IJqf9h031231 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 21:52:41 +0200 Message-ID: <50071383.6000605@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 21:50:27 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1FCD80DAD88647078C941CEA8422D020@AGB> <5006E6AC.2020507@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Graham, Well, as often announced i want to do some tests with a full size dipole for 630m. Maybe the signals will be very weak. QRSS is not usual on MF and so Opera or WSPR will be useful for the tests. However i would have no internet access during the tests... [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: b8b011f938af8abc4b241335cabd0691 Subject: Re: LF: increase in Opera 136 WANTED 136 QRO test stations ! Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060706020902080405020100" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:380366240:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404b5007143b088d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060706020902080405020100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Graham, Well, as often announced i want to do some tests with a full size dipole for 630m. Maybe the signals will be very weak. QRSS is not usual on MF and so Opera or WSPR will be useful for the tests. However i would have no internet access during the tests... BTW which information is contained in one OP message? Just the callsign or the callsign+locator? 73, Stefan > Thanks Stefan > Main thing is , that all stations have the same mode set , but > if you are using the windows software , the internet beacon > will show the mode , OP8 or OP32 ... this is where the PIC > based systems have a problem. but if the tx is remote , its > possible to simply run Op on a web linked PC to beacon via the > web .. > Monitors can run X2 Opera , one set to OP8 , the other OP32 > , with some CPU overhead , but not a problem on a 'new' pc better > , just the one session. > If you have a day selected, then can post to the user groups, > to ensure the maximum number of Rx stations > 73-G. --------------060706020902080405020100 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Graham,

Well, as often announced i want to do some tests with a full size dipole for 630m. Maybe the signals will be very weak. QRSS is not usual on MF and so Opera or WSPR will be useful for the tests. However i would have no internet access during the tests...

BTW which information is contained in one OP message? Just the callsign or the callsign+locator?


73, Stefan

Thanks Stefan
 
Main thing is , that  all  stations  have the  same  mode  set , but if  you  are  using   the  windows  software , the  internet  beacon  will  show  the  mode  , OP8 or  OP32 ... this  is  where  the  PIC  based   systems  have a  problem. but  if  the  tx  is  remote , its possible to  simply   run Op  on a   web linked  PC to beacon via the  web ..
 
Monitors  can  run  X2   Opera   , one set to  OP8  , the other  OP32  , with some  CPU overhead , but not a problem on  a  'new'  pc better , just the  one  session.
 
If you  have a  day  selected, then  can post  to the  user groups, to  ensure  the  maximum  number of  Rx  stations 
 
 
73-G.
--------------060706020902080405020100--