Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C7EC638000089; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 09:16:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SnrKi-00054F-3i for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 14:15:28 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SnrKh-000546-MG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 14:15:27 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SnrKc-00047Y-9n for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 14:15:26 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q68DFLBq007536 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 15:15:21 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q68DFLkn021489 for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 15:15:21 +0200 Message-ID: <4FF9876C.9080901@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 15:13:16 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4FF8A6FC.3080908@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <37CC48361C33472E82257B6C6E9AEF92@W1KW> In-Reply-To: <37CC48361C33472E82257B6C6E9AEF92@W1KW> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Geri, Yes, i heared a station in CW on my QRG but it was just a bit to weak to copy the call. Also there was QSB, you know... I was testing the ferrite antenna and the first impression is very good! There was very little noise when pointing to NW/SE but this is not really your direction. When turning the antenna to your direction, there was local QRM and the S/N didn't improve. Testing the ferrite antenna in another location, some 10m distant, that local QRM problem was not existing, so maybe i just have to move the H field antenna a few meters and will get better results. But then i have to move the shack or have to remotely rotate the antenna. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 739d4fb39bd02fc5a2de5437a39bb056 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Saturday night... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc1464ff9883e36b3 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Geri, Yes, i heared a station in CW on my QRG but it was just a bit to weak to copy the call. Also there was QSB, you know... I was testing the ferrite antenna and the first impression is very good! There was very little noise when pointing to NW/SE but this is not really your direction. When turning the antenna to your direction, there was local QRM and the S/N didn't improve. Testing the ferrite antenna in another location, some 10m distant, that local QRM problem was not existing, so maybe i just have to move the H field antenna a few meters and will get better results. But then i have to move the shack or have to remotely rotate the antenna. Still some work to do... Today i want to construct a combiner for the avtive E and active H field antenna to get a cardioidal antenna. That would be much smaller than a K9AY type and even /p in a backpack. So maybe there could be some more improvements soon. Hope to hear you in the next attempts. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 08.07.2012 09:05, schrieb Holger 'Geri', DK8KW - DI2BO - W1KW: > Stefan, > > I tried to call you for about 30 minutes yesterday night when you > called cq. You seemed to have heard me at some point because you > called qrz but then again I was not succesful to be heard by you. Your > signal was up to 579, going down to 449, but always audible. > > My ERP is around 0.4 Watt. > > 73 > > Geri, DK8KW & DI2BO