Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id EBC5238000082; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 17:18:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SncNv-0001us-VR for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 22:17:47 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SncNv-0001uj-JE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 22:17:47 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SncNt-00014r-9T for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 22:17:46 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q67LHinR020865 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 23:17:44 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q67LHil1029419 for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 23:17:44 +0200 Message-ID: <4FF8A6FC.3080908@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 23:15:40 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: MF, Is there really no one QRV from Germany or the others in the 500 kHz range???? On a late saturday night without much QRN?? I'm running my active ferrite antenna now and it looks quite promising. However it is affected from the TX antenna as well, even if it is detuned (not completely). [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 1f795a2ee1ecd56682b47ad11969b3d3 Subject: LF: Saturday night... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc14a4ff8a7a51895 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none MF, Is there really no one QRV from Germany or the others in the 500 kHz range???? On a late saturday night without much QRN?? I'm running my active ferrite antenna now and it looks quite promising. However it is affected from the TX antenna as well, even if it is detuned (not completely). The bearing to UK / PA looks very clean. I'm directing the antenna in this direction. Now CQ 472.5 kHz... 73, Stefan/DK7FC