Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 87EA5380000A5; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 15:34:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SmrnM-0002C8-9L for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 20:32:56 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SmrnI-0002Bz-30 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 20:32:52 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SmrnG-0008Lw-IV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 20:32:50 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q65JWne7010794 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 21:32:49 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q65JWnWA027336 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 21:32:49 +0200 Message-ID: <4FF5EB68.9040507@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 21:30:48 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FAB99CC@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> <1SmrFA-199XcW0@fwd21.t-online.de> In-Reply-To: <1SmrFA-199XcW0@fwd21.t-online.de> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Ha-Jo, Can you pull one of the xtals to cover the whole band? 73, Stefan [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 7aa9ad08848e488e22e0ff1d71f4ef1d Subject: Re: LF: RE: Analog oscillators Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:476124064:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60184ff5ec340ec0 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Ha-Jo, Can you pull one of the xtals to cover the whole band? 73, Stefan Am 05.07.2012 20:57, schrieb hajo.brandt.dj1zb@t-online.de: > Dear all, > > the only parts I have bought so far for MF (still beeing engaged in > other developments) are two crystals: 6,5536 MHz and 7,0200 MHz, to be > mixed with each other. The mixer is another bipolar transistor, and its > emitter current is being keyed. A final source follower after the > low-pass filter will deliver the output to 50 ohms. > > The same solution I have also used on LF. > > 73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB > > >