Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2DE68380000A9; Sun, 1 Jul 2012 17:40:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SlRri-0007Xh-Np for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2012 22:39:34 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SlRri-0007XY-Ae for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2012 22:39:34 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SlRrg-0006gQ-MK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2012 22:39:33 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q61LdVTr023576 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2012 23:39:31 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q61LdVL2003640 for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2012 23:39:31 +0200 Message-ID: <4FF0C320.9040701@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 23:37:36 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Dave, MF, Am 01.07.2012 23:22, schrieb Dave G3WCB.: > Dear MF, > > I just copied DJ5BV calling CQ on 472.63 kHz. RST 449, lots of QRN. > Hmmmm, i know that call from somewhere but don't remember. Hopefully this will be a very active band in the coming months and years. Could make some hope for amateur radio world below 1 MHz. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 086f3faad0220c9ae57a7913e711a86d Subject: Re: LF: FW: DJ5BV... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:490850272:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40824ff0c3d025f4 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Dave, MF, Am 01.07.2012 23:22, schrieb Dave G3WCB.: > Dear MF, > > I just copied DJ5BV calling CQ on 472.63 kHz. RST 449, lots of QRN. > Hmmmm, i know that call from somewhere but don't remember. Hopefully this will be a very active band in the coming months and years. Could make some hope for amateur radio world below 1 MHz. > Is this now the de-facto centre of CW activity on this band? > Good question! At least a CW center of activity on the lower end of the band is in analogy with the HF/VHF/UHF bands. Also this QRG is free of NDB QRM, at least since i'm watching the band and local grabbers. The only reason why i focus on 476.5 kHz is that this QRG is still displayed on the Delft web sdr and i have low local QRM there as well... I think the CW sector needs a larger quiet region (a full free kHz would be fine) while a digimode has no problem with a carrier a few Hz apart. The spectrum of the new band looks very quiet at G4WGT. We will make our experiences, especially in the winther. 73, Stefan/DK7FC > 73, Dave G3WCB IO91RV, Nr Windsor, S.E. England. > > >