Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id DF14F380000BA; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:32:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SuTm4-0007IZ-Vl for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 20:31:04 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SuTm4-0007IQ-AQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 20:31:04 +0100 Received: from authsmtp09.register.it ([81.88.48.59] helo=authsmtp.register.it) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SuTm2-0004q6-0k for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 20:31:03 +0100 Received: (qmail 1442 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2012 19:31:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?1.3.1.144?) (smtp@netlabitalia.it@37.102.34.244) by authsmtp.register.it with ESMTPA; 26 Jul 2012 19:31:00 -0000 References: <714A4D3FC7A94F8EB1BE8D3983799E10@AGB> <928D78F9-CCAE-4F1B-A439-EC3976FF43BD@arimi.it> <501190C3.1050500@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> From: IZ2JGB X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9B206) In-Reply-To: <501190C3.1050500@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Message-Id: <33E445B7-3085-465B-BA02-2935A5E1D87B@arimi.it> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 21:30:56 +0200 To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 81.88.48.59 (authsmtp09.register.it) used invalid HELO/EHLO authsmtp.register.it - verification failed X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Ehm .... wow :) Those monsters looks impressive. Yes, today i was holding the kite while Laying on the sand. Even a ham needs some rest : ) [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [81.88.48.59 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 64437c466041e93ffedda7fb96b22b71 Subject: Re: LF: Kites Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:461970944:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404c50119b4c3402 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Ehm .... wow :) Those monsters looks impressive. Yes, today i was holding the kite while Laying on the sand. Even a ham needs some rest : ) Thanks for the useful infos! 73, Giorgio Inviato da iPhone Il giorno 26/lug/2012, alle ore 20:47, Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer ha scritto: > Giorgio, >=20 > If you want to do experiments even at poor wind speeds and have a fix poin= t that is really FIXED!, then i recommend this kite series: http://www.premi= erkites.com/collections/pdf/Sleds.pdf > On the last page there is the 8.1 m^2 version. This one flies stable at 10= km/h. But at 4-5 BFT you will have a real problem to bring it down again! B= elive me, i've been there :-) >=20 > 73, Stefan/DK7FC >=20 > PS: They say 8.1 square feet but of course it is sqare meters (http://en.= wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Climate_Orbiter#Cause_of_failure ) :-) >=20 > Am 26.07.2012 18:16, schrieb IZ2JGB: >> TNX Graham! >>=20 >> I'll have a look at that. >>=20 >> 73 de iz2jgb >=20