Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id BA928380000AC; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 16:45:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Sq8bQ-0006Go-4M for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 21:06:08 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Sq8bP-0006Gf-5H for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 21:06:07 +0100 Received: from smtpout1.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.29] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Sq8bM-0000NQ-PR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 21:06:06 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.26.21.219]) by mwinf5d01 with ME id aL631j00B4jce6y03L64nR; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 22:06:04 +0200 Message-ID: <3276F2210AEA4C14843256CE9A603133@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <4FFF49E4.3040604@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>, <1953BDD65F0E4832AF043E22C05F5650@AGB>, <4FFF5E95.6020706@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5001A14A.30585.1055DF9@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> In-Reply-To: <5001A14A.30585.1055DF9@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 21:06:03 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: ''Coupled with this, there are relatively short periods of very good conditions amongst the QSB which could be taken advantage of by a faster speed.'' Mike, That's the $64,000 question , is there enough burst time in the cycle to exceed the -40 dB lower threshold , but -40 is the average along the time line , like stocks and shares the signal can move up and down , round this point , the same dsp engine is decoding at -50 dB at 4 hours in the experimental 8KHz mode , still waiting for MAL to sort his licence out (HIHI) we have the 600 ft loop this side of the hill. [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE 0.0 LOTS_OF_MONEY Huge... sums of money X-Scan-Signature: ac0f6ff1af52b6036ac1f4fe0c2bd52c Subject: Re: LF: LF OP32 to VK?? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:410204960:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4ad25001da751786 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none ''Coupled with this, there are relatively short periods of very good conditions amongst the QSB which could be taken advantage of by a faster speed.'' Mike, That's the $64,000 question , is there enough burst time in the cycle to exceed the -40 dB lower threshold , but -40 is the average along the time line , like stocks and shares the signal can move up and down , round this point , the same dsp engine is decoding at -50 dB at 4 hours in the experimental 8KHz mode , still waiting for MAL to sort his licence out (HIHI) we have the 600 ft loop this side of the hill. I believe the path loss is in the order of 40 dB , so who knows , Gary crossed the Atlantic with 300 watts to a 30 ft top loaded vertical, using OP8 ,looking at the screen captures 10 dB variation in signal can be seen But I think there will be a lot of stations tuned in during the tests, what ever the outcome ! 73 -Graham http://groups.yahoo.com/group/O_P_E_R_A_/photos/album/2031588689/pic/782098276/view?picmode=&mode=tn&order=ordinal&start=1&count=20&dir=asc -------------------------------------------------- From: "Mike Dennison" Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2012 4:41 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: LF OP32 to VK?? >> So do you and others think there will be a chance compared to >> DFCW-180? The next VK season may start in 6 weeks or so... >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > Op32 has been tested as roughly equivalent to QRSS10, so would be > unlikely to produce a good enough signal/noise for DL-VK. > > The dilemma of LF DX: is that you need to use a very narrow bandwidth > to get the S/N, so you need a very slow mode. However, the periods of > good conditions are not open for very long, so you need a faster > mode. > > Coupled with this, there are relatively short periods of very good > conditions amongst the QSB which could be taken advantage of by a > faster speed. > > Ideally you need a mode that will accumulate the results from several > periods of good reception over a few hours or even over several days. > > Mike, G3XDV > ========== > >