Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mc03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 4F97738000084; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 08:27:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1StHhZ-00049G-5v for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:25:29 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1StHhY-000497-MI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:25:28 +0100 Received: from mbox1.netikka.net ([213.250.81.202]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1StHhW-0002sl-OD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:25:27 +0100 Received: from hupu.netikka.net (hupu [172.16.83.91]) by mbox1-feedback.netikka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2451279F6 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:25:24 +0300 (EEST) Received: from w3mail.netikka.fi (w3mail-lb1.netikka.fi [81.209.31.92]) by hupu.netikka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C124B004B for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:25:24 +0300 (EEST) Received: by w3mail.netikka.fi (Postfix, from userid 33) id 60BB628555; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:25:24 +0300 (EEST) Received: from proxy.wartsila.com (proxy.wartsila.com [194.251.142.28]) by w3mail.netikka.fi (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:25:24 +0300 Message-ID: <20120723152524.350920d89ielpuck@w3mail.netikka.fi> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:25:24 +0300 From: phl@netikka.fi To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <002801cd67f2$b2d3bd60$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>, <500C35E0.8010507@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>, <43A1879A-58FF-480A-A148-65811EAB486E@dk8kw.de> <500D215D.27455.45EBAE5@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> In-Reply-To: <500D215D.27455.45EBAE5@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.11) X-Originating-IP: 194.251.142.28 X-Originating-node: 172.16.90.38 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Mike, Geri, LF Mike, do you use a transformer between the feeder coax and the antenna? A transformer can serve double purpose as impedance trasformer to match the resonated antenna to 50ohm and at the same time galvanically isolate the antenna from the coax. This requires separate primary and secondary windings on the transformer and the coax shield must not be earthed at the antenna end. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [213.250.81.202 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 60b21f5b7eb190e65b65540006a87038 Subject: Re: LF: Receive interference at MF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:474223520:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d604b500d431d0e02 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Mike, Geri, LF Mike, do you use a transformer between the feeder coax and the antenna? A transformer can serve double purpose as impedance trasformer to =20 match the resonated antenna to 50ohm and at the same time galvanically =20 isolate the antenna from the coax. This requires separate primary and =20 secondary windings on the transformer and the coax shield must not be =20 earthed at the antenna end. The above arrangement is perhaps a substitute for insulated radials =20 and can easily be reverted to unisolated by connecting the coax shield =20 to the antenna ground. At my QTH the isolating transformer helps with interference but the =20 Mini-Whip still has an edge over that solution. However, when the =20 resonant antenna is operational it degrades the mini-whip SNR around =20 the resonant frequency due to coupling as the distance between the =20 antennas is less than 10 metres. Can't have it all at the same time =20 unless a "remote-detune" function is provided for the resonant antenna. BR Paul-Henrik, OH1LSQ Quoting Mike Dennison : > Geri, > > Have you looked at your ground system? On 136kHz a network of earth > stakes works well as a receive ground. However, I have found that at > MF (including topband) I need insulated radials to reduce the > interference from household electronics, particularly my own plasma > TV. On 500kHz, the best results involve disconnecting one (but not > all) of my earth stakes, and on topband I disconnect all of the > stakes. My garden is only 20m long but I still get receive > improvements with radials. > > Mike, G3XDV > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > >> Yes, it's partly due to groundwave/skywave conditions but I am already >> known as the crocodile (big mouth, tiny ears) over here in Northern >> Germany because my signal is 599 all around while I can barely hear >> people. On LF I had optimized my receiving system pretty much but on >> MF I have a high noise floor, probably from household electronics. One >> solution surely is to put an e-field antenna some 25m away from the >> house into the garden, equally far away from all houses in the >> neighborhood. Currently I am using my transmitting umbrella antenna to >> receive, which always proved best on LF but probably needs some >> re-thinking for MF. Additionally I got hold of a R&S EK070 on EBay >> last week and I am eagerly waiting for it to arrive. At least then >> nobody can complain that my receiver is lousy ;) >> >> Lots of things to do and to explore on MF, which is a great part of >> the fun. And until I am fully set up for TX and RX on 475 kHz I use >> some non-amateur communication devices such as Echolink and VHF >> repeaters to do my day-to-day communications ;) >> >> Best 73 >> >> Geri, DK8KW & DI2BO >> >> >> On 22.07.2012, at 19:18, Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer >> wrote: >> >> > Geri, >> > >> > I bet it is only due to groundwave limitations. Normally you should >> > hear Mal. So far he is the strongest signal i heared on MF. But at >> > 11 UTC you can forget about MF skywave, at least in central Germany >> > and in summer. >> > >> > Last night DF0WD and DF6NM were perfectly audible. But this is after >> > 0 AM local! Later even the QSB was lower and the signals stronger. >> > >> > 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> > >> > >> > Am 22.07.2012 12:24, schrieb Holger 'Geri', DK8KW - DI2BO - W1KW: >> >> >> >> Mal, >> >> >> >> Sorry, no coppy here, however, I know that my rx-equipment needs >> >> improvemen. EK 070 and Mini Whip is already on order ... >> >> >> >> 73 >> >> >> >> Geri, DK8KW & DI2BO >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> From: mal hamilton >> >> To: rsgb >> >> Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 12:13 PM >> >> Subject: LF: 502 CQ >> >> >> >> MF >> >> Now CQ around 502 on CW >> >> >> >> De mal/g3kev >> >> >> > > > > >