Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D6855380000B1; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 08:43:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SsvU3-0000OV-7l for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 13:42:03 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SsvU2-0000OM-K3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 13:42:02 +0100 Received: from mailout09.t-online.de ([194.25.134.84]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SsvU0-0007cw-VN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 13:42:01 +0100 Received: from fwd11.aul.t-online.de (fwd11.aul.t-online.de ) by mailout09.t-online.de with smtp id 1SsvTy-0002fv-Ld; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 14:41:58 +0200 Received: from [192.168.2.32] (ZqPOMEZXQhTUtgl+UrhH23yznjFiYOTnQwLI4OtUYA+uVxmg5cVRnVxc3BTBnGywtp@[91.57.89.249]) by fwd11.t-online.de with esmtp id 1SsvTq-1JgtpC0; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 14:41:50 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: hajo.brandt.dj1zb@t-online.de References:<500B3CBF.7030804@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To:<500B3CBF.7030804@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> To: X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 6.08.0003 Date: 22 Jul 2012 12:41 GMT Message-ID: <1SsvTq-1JgtpC0@fwd11.t-online.de> X-ID: ZqPOMEZXQhTUtgl+UrhH23yznjFiYOTnQwLI4OtUYA+uVxmg5cVRnVxc3BTBnGywtp X-TOI-MSGID: 2877eac6-5274-4e6f-854d-9c65179f14d4 X-RFC2822-Warning: Obsolete format in Date: header X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dear Stefan, in eastern Bavaria (JN68GN) I have copied your signal and that of DF6NM on 472,5 kHz at around 00.35h local time. Copy had not been a pleasure because of qrn. I have not heard DF0WD, this call had just been mentioned by DF6NM when answering to You. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [194.25.134.84 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines X-Scan-Signature: 7aa9ad08848e488e22e0ff1d71f4ef1d Subject: Re: LF: QSO on MF Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:386375264:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600d500bf56a6064 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror Dear Stefan, in eastern Bavaria (JN68GN) I have copied your signal and that of DF6NM on 472,5 kHz at around 00.35h local time. Copy had not been a pleasure because of qrn. I have not heard DF0WD, this call had just been mentioned by DF6NM when answering to You. At that time beacon BIA was louder here than your signals. 73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB "Stefan Schäfer" schrieb: > right now since 1 hour DF0WD and DF6Nm and DK7FC on 472.5 kHz. > > Join in, all!! :-) > > 73, Stefan > >