Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dg06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 1D10538000091; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 14:58:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SmrFG-00023x-Qs for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 19:57:42 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SmrFG-00023o-8v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 19:57:42 +0100 Received: from mailout05.t-online.de ([194.25.134.82]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SmrFD-0008GE-Kb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 19:57:41 +0100 Received: from fwd21.aul.t-online.de (fwd21.aul.t-online.de ) by mailout05.t-online.de with smtp id 1SmrFC-0002qV-7U; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 20:57:38 +0200 Received: from [192.168.2.32] (S8VeMcZrghWhrpKuO9izY7M0NN2kHWLCpas7ApnGDWb4CmXHGc6KCayzup8NvqygBh@[79.237.174.212]) by fwd21.t-online.de with esmtp id 1SmrFA-199XcW0; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 20:57:36 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: hajo.brandt.dj1zb@t-online.de References: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FAB99CC@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> In-Reply-To:<7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FAB99CC@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> To: X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 6.08.0003 Date: 05 Jul 2012 18:57 GMT Message-ID: <1SmrFA-199XcW0@fwd21.t-online.de> X-ID: S8VeMcZrghWhrpKuO9izY7M0NN2kHWLCpas7ApnGDWb4CmXHGc6KCayzup8NvqygBh X-TOI-MSGID: aacb92f5-d18c-4da3-9bf8-7f1d27b9f935 X-RFC2822-Warning: Obsolete format in Date: header X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dear all, the only parts I have bought so far for MF (still beeing engaged in other developments) are two crystals: 6,5536 MHz and 7,0200 MHz, to be mixed with each other. The mixer is another bipolar transistor, and its emitter current is being keyed. A final source follower after the low-pass filter will deliver the output to 50 ohms. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [194.25.134.82 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines X-Scan-Signature: 3d0ae5b4ae8b74dc4bf5c1dbe3fef430 Subject: RE: LF: RE: Analog oscillators Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=5.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:460552640:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d410e4ff5e3db0e80 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Dear all, the only parts I have bought so far for MF (still beeing engaged in other developments) are two crystals: 6,5536 MHz and 7,0200 MHz, to be mixed with each other. The mixer is another bipolar transistor, and its emitter current is being keyed. A final source follower after the low-pass filter will deliver the output to 50 ohms. The same solution I have also used on LF. 73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB "Rik Strobbe" schrieb: > Stefan, > > what about a huff&puff oscillator (http://www.hanssummers.com/huffpuff.html) ? > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T > > ________________________________________ > Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens Stefan Schäfer [Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de] > Verzonden: donderdag 5 juli 2012 19:09 > Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Onderwerp: Re: LF: RE: Analog oscillators > > Hi Victor, > > Am 05.07.2012 19:00, schrieb victor13@online.nl: > > Hello Stefan, > > > > for narrowband vfo i get best results with a clap or a seiler,both with big > > parallel c over the FET.But of course everything depends on the mechanical > > stability and the quality of the parts: ceramic coilformer,silvered mica > > capacitors and tempcompensation with N750 ceramic capacitors.With trial and > > error you may get very good results. > OK, tnx. Years ago i built a 137 kHz oscillator (by DJ2EY) which used > diffent capacitors for temperature compensation. I will see what i get... > > > Use big parts,temprise will be less,so > > stability will be better.. > > > > That sounds convincing, tnx. Meanwhile the output stage is built, once > again using a ICL7667. I would like to use a JFET. And i found a nice > link in the web, of course from W1VD: http://www.w1vd.com/16080VFO.pdf > > That is nice and i have all the parts here. I will build it and hope to > try it in the evening :-) > > BTW are you QRV on 500 CW as well? > > 73, Stefan > > > > > > GL > > 73 > > Victor > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]Namens Stefan Schäfer > > Verzonden: donderdag 5 juli 2012 18:32 > > Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > Onderwerp: LF: Analog oscillators > > > > > > LF/MF, > > > > I want to build an analog oscillator running on 1888....1916 kHz. It > > will be used as the input VFO for my PA which divides the frequency by 4 > > internally. A metallic box with 12V input voltage cables and a RG174 > > cable for the output is already available. Also a 78L05 with its 100nF > > Cs is mounted. Later i can label the scale directly with 472...479 kHz, > > so the need to divde by 4 in my head will not be necessary any more. > > > > The output voltage should be arround 12V. The curve form is not > > critical, it does not need to be a clear sine wave. However the > > frequency should be as stable as possible. > > > > So, what is the best oscillator circuit? Are there strong differences > > regarding stability or is it always a question of the temperature? Ah, > > it must be a LC oscillator. The adjusting part is a variable C of 33pF > > with a 6mm axis. > > > > There are a lot of circuits in the web but maybe one principe is to be > > preferred.. > > > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > > > > > > > > > >