Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 06193380000AB; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 19:44:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SrduI-00072g-9b for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:43:50 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SrduH-00072Q-Fl for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:43:49 +0100 Received: from qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.48]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SrduF-00069o-0F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:43:48 +0100 Received: from omta20.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.71]) by qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id btFo1j00B1YDfWL55zjo3Q; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 23:43:48 +0000 Received: from JAYDELL ([71.234.119.9]) by omta20.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id bzjc1j0070CFS1j3gzjcgV; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 23:43:37 +0000 Message-ID: <001701cd653f$2b5b4840$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> From: To: References: <002701cd6527$d5a7b440$6d01a8c0@DELL4> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 19:43:43 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan This may be of interest for your next exploit ... Looking back in my 500 kHz log, I see that on 1/3/2010 I had a CW QSO with WD2XSH/35 in South Dakota ... who was running a full size 600 meter dipole. As I recall his antenna was relatively low at 30 or 40' above ground and he was running only 50 or 100 watts. His signal was weak but solid copy over the few nights that he was active. Distance was 1210 mi / 1950kM. Believe his antenna was 'out in the open' as he apparently owns a good sized farm. [...] Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.62.48 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.7 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D X-Scan-Signature: 54f9a9b24d9d5f31a632377c3b90b222 Subject: LF: 630 meter full size dipole Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0013_01CD651D.A3A048E0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:427237632:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d618950074a5f0e7c X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0013_01CD651D.A3A048E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Stefan This may be of interest for your next exploit ... Looking back in my 500 kHz log, I see that on 1/3/2010 I had a CW QSO with WD2XSH/35 in South Dakota ... who was running a full size 600 meter dipole. As I recall his antenna was relatively low at 30 or 40' above ground and he was running only 50 or 100 watts. His signal was weak but solid copy over the few nights that he was active. Distance was 1210 mi / 1950kM. Believe his antenna was 'out in the open' as he apparently owns a good sized farm. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 ----- Original Message ----- From: Stefan Schäfer To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 3:50 PM Subject: Re: LF: increase in Opera 136 WANTED 136 QRO test stations ! Hi Graham, Well, as often announced i want to do some tests with a full size dipole for 630m. Maybe the signals will be very weak. QRSS is not usual on MF and so Opera or WSPR will be useful for the tests. However i would have no internet access during the tests... BTW which information is contained in one OP message? Just the callsign or the callsign+locator? 73, Stefan Thanks Stefan Main thing is , that all stations have the same mode set , but if you are using the windows software , the internet beacon will show the mode , OP8 or OP32 ... this is where the PIC based systems have a problem. but if the tx is remote , its possible to simply run Op on a web linked PC to beacon via the web .. Monitors can run X2 Opera , one set to OP8 , the other OP32 , with some CPU overhead , but not a problem on a 'new' pc better , just the one session. If you have a day selected, then can post to the user groups, to ensure the maximum number of Rx stations 73-G. ------=_NextPart_000_0013_01CD651D.A3A048E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stefan
 
This may be of interest for your next=20 exploit ...
 
Looking back in my 500 kHz log, I see = that=20 on 1/3/2010 I had a CW QSO with WD2XSH/35 in South Dakota = ... who was running a full size 600 meter dipole. As I = recall his=20 antenna was relatively low at 30 or 40' above ground = and he=20 was running only 50 or 100 watts. His signal was weak but solid copy = over the=20 few nights that he was active. Distance was 1210 mi / 1950kM. Believe = his=20 antenna was 'out in the open' as he apparently owns a good sized=20 farm.
 
Jay W1VD  WD2XNS =20 WE2XGR/2    
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Stefan = Sch=E4fer
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: LF: increase in Opera 136 WANTED 136 QRO test = stations !

Hi Graham,

Well, as often announced i want to = do some=20 tests with a full size dipole for 630m. Maybe the signals will be very = weak.=20 QRSS is not usual on MF and so Opera or WSPR will be useful for the = tests.=20 However i would have no internet access during the tests...

BTW = which=20 information is contained in one OP message? Just the callsign or the=20 callsign+locator?


73, Stefan

Thanks Stefan
 
Main thing is , that  all  stations  have = the =20 same  mode  set , but if  you  are =20 using   the  windows  software , the =20 internet  beacon  will  show  the  = mode  , OP8=20 or  OP32 ... this  is  where  the  = PIC =20 based   systems  have a  problem. but  = if =20 the  tx  is  remote , its possible to =20 simply   run Op  on a   web linked  PC = to=20 beacon via the  web ..
 
Monitors  can  run  X2  =  Opera   ,=20 one set to  OP8  , the other  OP32  , with = some =20 CPU overhead , but not a problem on  a  'new'  pc = better ,=20 just the  one  session.
 
If you  have a  day  selected, then  can = post =20 to the  user groups, to  ensure  the  = maximum =20 number of  Rx  stations 
 
 
73-G.
------=_NextPart_000_0013_01CD651D.A3A048E0--