Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5B549380001A9; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 12:30:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SrRBB-0002nP-FD for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:08:25 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SrRBA-0002nG-RA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:08:24 +0100 Received: from qmta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.59.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SrRB8-0000D3-IS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:08:23 +0100 Received: from omta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.59]) by QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id bm7T1j0031GhbT85Bm8PDr; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:08:23 +0000 Received: from JAYDELL ([71.234.119.9]) by omta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id bm8V1j00C0CFS1j3Tm8Vc7; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:08:29 +0000 Message-ID: <000a01cd64cd$42079980$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> From: To: References: <5005F485.6000005@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5005F9C7.4070706@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 06:08:19 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan After seeing your signal on the TF grabber I decided to have a look ... not so much as a trace of a signal last night. While static certainly wasn't low it wasn't as bad as it gets either. Thought the 20 dB s/n at TF might bode well for a reception here. The path from DK to TF is apparently not much of an indicator for conditions between DF and W1. DST was running about -50 nT so wasn't expecting too much. How many dB below FS were you running last night? [...] Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.59.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.7 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D X-Scan-Signature: 046f068074e745d5c60ca47deee9b503 Subject: Re: LF: G3XDV and DK7FC Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-15"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:485737344:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408d5006e4a87261 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Stefan After seeing your signal on the TF grabber I decided to have a look ... not so much as a trace of a signal last night. While static certainly wasn't low it wasn't as bad as it gets either. Thought the 20 dB s/n at TF might bode well for a reception here. The path from DK to TF is apparently not much of an indicator for conditions between DF and W1. DST was running about -50 nT so wasn't expecting too much. How many dB below FS were you running last night? Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" To: Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 7:48 PM Subject: Re: LF: G3XDV and DK7FC > BTW the TF3HZ grabber is online again! http://simnet.is/halldorgudmunds/TF3HZ_LFgrabber/ > > 73, Stefan > > >> Hello Mike, >> >> >> Your QRSS-120 signal is very well readable here of course. Due to your location you may be in an >> advanced position to leave a trace at YV7MAE in Venezuela. The QRN is quite high in the moment >> but who knows. No one from the UK has ever left a trace there so far! >> >> I wish you good luck and follow the night at >> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/74746618/LF/YV7MAE_LF_Grabber.html >> >> >> Also i will join in at 136.172 kHz now. >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >