Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id ACC8A38000095; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 15:18:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SbGIV-0004ev-Np for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 20:17:07 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SbGIU-0004em-Db for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 20:17:06 +0100 Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SbGIS-0003GU-Dx for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 20:17:05 +0100 Received: by wgbfa7 with SMTP id fa7so2800421wgb.28 for ; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 12:17:02 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:references:from:content-type:x-mailer:in-reply-to :message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=ooZOOrWPIGaDw4SPCIUd0d2Us5hmW+Y/gtch0rEZ3Iw=; b=lKDOq39jJdxVNZ7N+7dxtsRxBgiak52lfmoXzY6abIa3fYwShNxGdPMPE6XIOXz2o5 5krv235Vp85keo7QHADavv1iuNXtVK3GTgBPNrSVMd6hmscPfNZC72K6bQpcPJUdCbPB wdi1SJHh9hDYND/3XxqO8JtWeL5+VwHh0qPztKHx6KnONiPuFMmLpz2oXY8DfA/2GQfG 6zamZx6Y/993kZ+gfsQj/QpCIHpxOxeVzM2cssdvxv7buzwkCyvLO6+5RbwrR6OqZZZq JgW1ZZtlolRAsk53N+Yqw+E3Mhkbn4a/MXI9xDjaTSsCCdoaQDEd9Cwj/bzmUtph/r0U ltLA== Received: by 10.216.194.23 with SMTP id l23mr8333133wen.121.1338751022062; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 12:17:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (cpc6-cmbg17-2-0-cust624.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com. [86.30.58.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z8sm23510021wiy.1.2012.06.03.12.17.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 03 Jun 2012 12:17:00 -0700 (PDT) References: <4FCB225B.7020209@legal-medicine.de> <000b01cd416c$9bef0a20$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <00d501cd4198$727929b0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4FCB93EC.3030907@psk31.plus.com> <270B05A58E9F46F4AD21EFF298F32DE6@Shack> <003801cd41aa$bee050f0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: Roger Lapthorn X-Mailer: iPod Mail (9B206) In-Reply-To: <003801cd41aa$bee050f0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Message-Id: Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 20:16:55 +0100 To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Mal (et al), Please read my most recent posts on the Yahoo group for my views on moderation. It is unusual to ban anyone but where a member has been grossly offensive, repeatedly rude and hurtful to others, or consistently off-topic then the moderators have the right (duty even) to delete such posts or even suspend membership. I repeat this is highly unlikely if people are respectful of others and post on-topic without getting personal and offensive. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [74.125.82.47 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rogerlapthorn[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 MIME_QP_LONG_LINE RAW: Quoted-printable line longer than 76 chars 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 64bc660a83b79b15f4c44d2b2147e02d Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: O.T.: Reflector status Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-A00E65D5-1421-4AF2-BE93-74400C17D2F8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc1494fcbb87d7fb7 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --Apple-Mail-A00E65D5-1421-4AF2-BE93-74400C17D2F8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mal (et al), Please read my most recent posts on the Yahoo group for my views on moderati= on.=20 It is unusual to ban anyone but where a member has been grossly offensive, r= epeatedly rude and hurtful to others, or consistently off-topic then the mod= erators have the right (duty even) to delete such posts or even suspend memb= ership. I repeat this is highly unlikely if people are respectful of others a= nd post on-topic without getting personal and offensive.=20 Now, let's please get back to LF matters and on the Yahoo group where most s= eem perfectly happy.=20 73s Roger G3XBM -- Via my 2.4GHz transceiver -- On 3 Jun 2012, at 18:03, "mal hamilton" wrote: > How about an apology Eddie and a confirmation from G3XBM > G3KEV > =20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Tony > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 4:56 PM > Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: O.T.: Reflector status >=20 > Umm, sorry Eddie ;-) > =20 > =20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Roger Lapthorn > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 9:51 PM > Subject: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE > =20 > > Difficult members can be banned in exceptional circumstances. > > =20 > =20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: g3zjo > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 4:42 PM > Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: O.T.: Reflector status >=20 > On 03/06/2012 15:52, mal hamilton wrote: >>=20 >> Well John >> When you get G3XBM in a email/posting some time back indicating that a mo= ve to Yahoo would enable more control to ban persons like me whose opinions a= nd point of view differ from his, this is hardly encouraging or democratic.= >> A sysop is necessary to ensure smooth operation of any organised group bu= t not CENSORSHIP or BANNING. >>=20 > Come on Mal >=20 > I am sure Roger can stick up for himself but please don't resort to lies. >=20 > Eddie > =20 --Apple-Mail-A00E65D5-1421-4AF2-BE93-74400C17D2F8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Mal (et al),
Please read my most recent posts on the Yahoo group for my views= on moderation. 

It is unusual to ban anyone b= ut where a member has been grossly offensive, repeatedly rude and hurtful to= others, or consistently off-topic then the moderators have the right (duty e= ven) to delete such posts or even suspend membership. I repeat this is highl= y unlikely if people are respectful of others and post on-topic without gett= ing personal and offensive. 

Now, let's please= get back to LF matters and on the Yahoo group where most seem perfectly hap= py. 

73s
Roger G3XBM

<= /div>


-- Via my 2.4GHz transceiver --

O= n 3 Jun 2012, at 18:03, "mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net> wrote:

How about an apology Eddie and a confirmation from= =20 G3XBM
G3KEV
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 T= ony=20
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 4:56 PM=
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: O.T.: Refl= ector=20 status

Umm, sorry Eddie ;-)
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 9:51=20= PM
Subject: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yaho= o=20 group instead .....PLEASE
 
<snip>
Difficult members can be banned in exceptional circumstances.
<snip>
 
 
----- Original Message -----
= From:=20 g= 3zjo=20
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 4:42=20= PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: O.T.:=20= Reflector status

On 03/06/2012 15:52, mal hamilton wrote:=20
Well John
When you get G3XBM in a email/posting some t= ime back=20 indicating that a move to Yahoo would enable more control to ban perso= ns=20 like me whose opinions and point of view differ from his,  this i= s=20 hardly encouraging or democratic.
A sysop is necessary to ensure smooth operat= ion of=20 any organised group but not CENSORSHIP or BANNING.

Come on Mal

I am sure Roger can stick up for himself but ple= ase=20 don't resort to lies.

Eddie
 
= --Apple-Mail-A00E65D5-1421-4AF2-BE93-74400C17D2F8--