Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 44CAB3800008B; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 07:45:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SfrQe-0005kZ-Id for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 12:44:32 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SfrQe-0005kQ-1G for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 12:44:32 +0100 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SfrQc-0001e9-Ar for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 12:44:30 +0100 Received: from W1KW (77-21-14-177-dynip.superkabel.de [77.21.14.177]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MDTqb-1ShCD2080T-00HS0M; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:44:29 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Holger 'Geri', DK8KW - DI2BO - W1KW" To: References: <2C0E979FCD1845DC8B3CA6CBBED621F0@AGB> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FAAD50C@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> <4FDB065C.8060202@xs4all.nl> <1339767393.38173.YahooMailNeo@web171602.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <6127C0D605D3463B803A5D57D87FEC56@AGB> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:44:28 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:iC1a6wUDwudNdfdTFFWcMO8EcRCIwZGAg9H/mbWJdB0 bSvZD8EtWNf+3iYru3JoDfIf2K/FH6JxB6NGz2jtjNPmSGBMc2 FWerzuW22OEDxmg5cIZTbZ8PSb67MaK9CoijLU3R2ZXC5lNvKa 6p4kscVFvpxrIqwH+663Srwon+U25oG8k4meKdUCwIlosT+nbM RL342Pj4MUwc1J7bllJiI0URqCjoDDZCOotCXZ0qBn7ovX7woJ kdJ3fc8k0NPqrSxPZQd06CFHBfEf3DCXBM3qNN1gFn18q/bskZ VkebKroaaovTEo8/PavBesGiyfLqDwZpMXnmPZdFbLOpQnzTA= = X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: What are the actual frequencies that are then occupied by OPERA? As long as it is guaranteed that it's all below 2000 Hz above the dial frequency, 477 sounds like a good plan as a start. 73 Geri, DK8KW & DI2BO [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.227.126.186 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: e51657317b06d9cbe905ec682fad6602 Subject: Re: LF: RE: New Opera QRG for 472 Khz Band ?? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0010_01CD4BC6.2655FDF0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,HTML_50_60, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:386968608:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40cb4fdc71d20cde X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01CD4BC6.2655FDF0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable What are the actual frequencies that are then occupied by OPERA? As long = as it is guaranteed that it's all below 2000 Hz above the dial = frequency, 477 sounds like a good plan as a start.=20 73 Geri, DK8KW & DI2BO ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Graham=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2012 1:32 PM Subject: Re: LF: RE: New Opera QRG for 472 Khz Band ?? Up to now , 477 is the only frequency on offer ? G. From: M0FMT=20 Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 2:36 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: RE: New Opera QRG for 472 Khz Band ?? I'd go with that Albert. 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX From: Albert To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Friday, 15 June 2012, 10:54 Subject: Re: LF: RE: New Opera QRG for 472 Khz Band ?? G, Just to start the discussion, my proposal is dial 477 kHz. 73, Albert ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01CD4BC6.2655FDF0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =EF=BB=BF
What are the actual frequencies that = are then=20 occupied by OPERA? As long as it is guaranteed that it's all below 2000 = Hz above=20 the dial frequency, 477 sounds like a good plan as a start. =
 
73
 
Geri, DK8KW & DI2BO
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Graham
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2012 = 1:32=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: RE: New Opera = QRG for=20 472 Khz Band ??

Up to now , 477 is the  only  frequency   on = offer=20 ?
 
G.

From: M0FMT
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: LF: RE: New Opera QRG for 472 Khz Band=20 ??

I'd go with that Albert.
73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX
From: Albert <westberg@xs4all.nl>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20
Sent: Friday, 15 = June 2012,=20 10:54
Subject: Re: = LF: RE:=20 New Opera QRG for 472 Khz Band ??

G,

Just = to start=20 the discussion, my proposal is dial 477 kHz.

73,=20 = Albert





------=_NextPart_000_0010_01CD4BC6.2655FDF0--