Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5CF79380000F0; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 17:25:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Sg0TV-0001XE-Ke for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 22:24:05 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Sg0TV-0001X5-1k for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 22:24:05 +0100 Received: from mail-bk0-f43.google.com ([209.85.214.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Sg0TS-00041d-Q7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 22:24:03 +0100 Received: by bkty5 with SMTP id y5so6671366bkt.16 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:24:00 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=/T+K+sI6AchkUBDo4YJzsz2oRHhe1Y0dUmBttINY1WA=; b=g5bJtdpj/w0xZaS+xP0utMQJd1y+g9BPGpqawFYEL3ZRaGjbbkk5MS2PeEgjwkGXxL BAchkqDZd2fJJYLE7guf3A44n2GQY3impMobv7MMd864WVbgpYETRBuZutzk8f2Imjwo 2dhDm9MILWtE/MgfZhv33suopIFPBkPfvz460BbZBoWIcfn3I13RA1dXn/coqO7lQxUA r0uK+hm+6eXSSrEkjoW+z8bH24umoxRalbKoJcjoGLpmgkblLtOQLyvqR5sQNN0D1wyK BRMQ6bR+XVmqru0a0YCWbHZvybMia214TUxA9/6JScEMYEsOwNLxOVlVRPRad7++C4Go WmqQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.150.76 with SMTP id x12mr4376240bkv.97.1339881840641; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:24:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.178.73 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:24:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FDCF349.5060100@kpnmail.nl> References: <4FDCE611.7070004@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FDCEF47.9050805@kpnmail.nl> <4FDCF349.5060100@kpnmail.nl> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:24:00 +0300 Message-ID: From: Chris 4X1RF To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Jan, Stefan Congratulations for your 477.5 / 502 KHz QSO! It was fun to hear it in real time on the Delfi WebSdr. 73s Chris 4X1RF [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.214.43 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (chrisgomy[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: f7f918e40888a44a70dddae14bd6a529 Subject: Re: LF: CW on 477.5 kHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175dd9c62708f204c29d8d6d X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:471316096:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m225.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db4054fdcf9b96d8f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --0015175dd9c62708f204c29d8d6d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jan, Stefan Congratulations for your 477.5 / 502 KHz QSO! It was fun to hear it in real time on the Delfi WebSdr. 73s Chris 4X1RF On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 11:57 PM, pa3abk wrote: > Stefan, > > At the mom I'll will call you on 502kHz everytime you stop your CQ. > And stop when your CQ starts again. > > There's some QSB on it but have peaks in the region of 4-5. > > > Jan/pa3abk > > > On 16-6-2012 22:40, pa3abk wrote: > >> Stefan, >> >> Can you indicate were you listen in your CQ call? >> >> At te mom you are becoming better. >> >> >> >> Jan/pa3abk >> >> On 16-6-2012 22:01, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: >> >>> MF, >>> >>> Now my RX and active antenna is much better after adding a band filter >>> in front of the first gate. Most probably there was an overload of the >>> input before. Now DLF is 40 dB attenuated and the RX performs much bett= er. >>> I can hear the crashes / sferics and see several traces, still not sure= if >>> they are local QRM or a far field signal. >>> >>> My TX is ready as well. I will *call CQ on 477.5 kHz in CW and look for >>> skeds*! I can receive on 505 kHz (arround) as well but my filters in th= e RX >>> already attenuate the region by about 20 dB... Anyway worth a try. >>> >>> Starting now! >>> >>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >>> >> >> >> > > -- > pa3abk<-> dordrecht jo21it > > > --0015175dd9c62708f204c29d8d6d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Jan, Stefan

Congratulations for your 477.5 / 502 KHz QSO! It was fun to hear it in real= time on the Delfi WebSdr.


73s
Chris 4X1RF


On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 1= 1:57 PM, pa3abk <pa3abk@kpnmail.nl> wrote:
Stefan,

At the mom I'll will call you on 502kHz everytime you stop your CQ.
And stop when your CQ starts again.

There's some QSB on it but have peaks in the region of 4-5.


Jan/pa3abk


On 16-6-2012 22:40, pa3abk wrote:
Stefan,

Can you indicate were you listen in your CQ call?

At te mom you are becoming better.



Jan/pa3abk

On 16-6-2012 22:01, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote:
MF,

Now my RX and active antenna is much better after adding a band filter in f= ront of the first gate. Most probably there was an overload of the input be= fore. Now DLF is 40 dB attenuated and the RX performs much better. I can he= ar the crashes / sferics and see several traces, still not sure if they are= local QRM or a far field signal.

My TX is ready as well. I will *call CQ on 477.5 kHz in CW and look for skeds*! I can r= eceive on 505 kHz (arround) as well but my filters in the RX already attenu= ate the region by about 20 dB... Anyway worth a try.

Starting now!

73, Stefan/DK7FC




--
pa3abk<-> =A0dordrecht jo21it



--0015175dd9c62708f204c29d8d6d--