Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 89A3F380000B2; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 17:05:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SavUO-0001mX-Dh for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 22:04:00 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SavUN-0001mO-I5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 22:03:59 +0100 Received: from mail-bk0-f43.google.com ([209.85.214.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SavUL-0007FR-R6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 22:03:58 +0100 Received: by bkty5 with SMTP id y5so6125058bkt.16 for ; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 14:03:56 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=v1FgBiL6CC9je9akbS5EYxTON3TPkjo4DY3Bz1m1Dwg=; b=vn2LthidTB9rrsDJAINf4TX9+At9jcurd5V+VI8sExKyW+AEBg/RTFdVc8EWUFshTp RxhVWjIMl+r4D8YMg92hoN3NT1c8RnB8ImDctTPf1Tk4CjEXkjL2HSDAa67qvYkAcmgt NauuhEzn73sF2Z+JTWChW+y2TSKI2AidEqrR6QBOUKlzFlr8lq6G12TDe0AI1ZVviGJs lmU/cJqjWupEwk46smiyCqbP7bJkfJbjBI5Etgh76U8DOoiAf2+gpOQU0cu8o+GZjpmv 95OsqWbhTNEpHrtoXA/yIda3z3gHEIPvCmE4bUXkliBVGcjgqnmIaiBaxrP+ZKrhB/g1 kYiA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.134.1 with SMTP id ia1mr4160055bkc.77.1338671036188; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 14:03:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.64.78 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 14:03:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FCA6376.4030702@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> References: <8BE4322932454ABBAF36917E7F0B7293@uwePC> <02bb01cd3eb1$c4cb1730$1502a8c0@Clemens04> <1338444302.19906.YahooMailNeo@web171605.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <18D068A53AF74F56BF8AFDCCAB65CC62@AGB> <1338488029.92944.YahooMailNeo@web171606.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <97F0E98E40814C45B796CFAF1351D46C@AGB> <4FC7CDF7.1090909@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FC7E2FC.3070002@psk31.plus.com> <3DD43F40887A4C08A4F53031CB126B04@AGB> <4FC7E9E1.7090509@psk31.plus.com> <1338636091.1363.YahooMailNeo@web171601.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <001301cd40b7$180c6230$1502a8c0@Clemens04> <1338640428.47967.YahooMailNeo@web171606.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <9AAFFD4E2A73484B91A5C743638F9076@AGB> <1338641975.19311.YahooMailNeo@web171602.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <4FCA4106.4000602@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FCA416D.6070901@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FCA6376.4030702@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 23:03:56 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: PN-YcwChRuYvKcxDNmo2Qu9sOUg Message-ID: From: PA7EY To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan, It was indeed your beacon that pulled me over to LF. It's a lot of fun and very interesting, as is reading the messages on the LF-reflector. (working on getting active on LF, but first priority is improving the reception of signals) [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.214.43 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (ulrich.idzes[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: d7907c3bf895ca41e0bedc3fa074f0d4 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Opera... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:417817312:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d239.1 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40844fca80240ec2 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Stefan, It was indeed your beacon that pulled me over to LF. It's a lot of fun and very interesting, as is reading the messages on the LF-reflector. (working on getting active on LF, but first priority is improving the reception of signals) vy 73, Ulrich, PA7EY 2012/6/2 Stefan Sch=E4fer : > Hi Ulrich, > > Very nice to meet you here! I already saw you on the pskmap in the web. H= ave > you been catched by the NL LF amateurs? :-) Some weeks i reported about o= ur > email contacts due to my CW beacon on 137 kHz. You reported that you saw = a > hit in the DX cluster about the CW beacon. > I would be glad if it was the beacon that moved you to LF as a newcomer := -) > Or did i misunderstand something? > > Vy 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > PS: Tnx for infos > > Am 02.06.2012 19:55, schrieb PA7EY: >> >> Stefan, >> >> According to the screenshot, it should be rts or dtr. Didn't try myself >> yet. >> >> As far as I know 1.4.1 is still the most recent one. Not sure about >> cpu, but on my several years old P4 2.8 GHz its no problem at all, cpu >> about 30%. >> >> 73, Ulrich >> >> 2012/6/2 Stefan Sch=E4fer: >> >>> >>> PS: Is the PC keyed by the RS232 port? Or what? Free choice of the TX >>> line >>> (TXD or DTR or RXD...) ? >>> >>> 73, Stefan >>> >>> Am 02.06.2012 18:36, schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer: >>> >>>> >>>> G.., LF, >>>> >>>> What is the current up to date opera version? Still v1.4.1? >>>> What about the CPU load, say on a 5...7 year old PC? >>>> >>>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >>>> >>> >>> >>> > >