Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 049BF3800009E; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:44:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Si618-0006JV-Fs for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:43:26 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Si618-0006JM-0u for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:43:26 +0100 Received: from mail-pz0-f43.google.com ([209.85.210.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Si615-00074C-NR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:43:24 +0100 Received: by dajz8 with SMTP id z8so3935274daj.16 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 08:43:20 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Mbld/1CM2joCk0NmB85mxh1wb2f3RJcXeiwI6Ujx9gY=; b=e6gtM9LZOEHvLfF0oVAafmUPwvHSEiKaFlrkH6ROHgYhKZ26puDFX64Ig1ytLbSoRs 33pvMKeHgiOsT4qKd9soc5rCc90x5YQWvvQHX0Km7njV4S6dxIfAKjNZpiV5Ilut2HQf RQkJd+6d522PN9d+vwLotBk9ZS6E+QFlyLoszhqI2/fjuXBFBd3DtDbtjRcScSydZy+S VcJSW3N+wgb3MTRz9m1kDI09ixR0xo7MyV28sl7hVIdIUWhfV/XTYN5qJOBDd/EKTQOl P1maycY6sEOGPrvCBkPTSRidAXfqdOzhpaKvsZ5v33GU4UUhvPXsHcbzayNinXO+1IZM 2NHw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.232.170 with SMTP id tp10mr11571667pbc.59.1340379799508; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 08:43:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.253.6 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 08:43:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:43:19 +0100 Message-ID: From: Roger Lapthorn To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Just wondering how people think the current set-up is working? The recent poll suggested a large majority would be happy with a full migration to Yahoo, but we seem to now have a very messy split with postings in either place or both. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.210.43 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rogerlapthorn[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: b1e5ebccbad86c8ca1fd46d24f0285de Subject: LF: Blacksheep and Yahoo Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b33d5bed055d904c3117d8c X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:310624992:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m009.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608e4fe492f777f5 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --047d7b33d5bed055d904c3117d8c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Just wondering how people think the current set-up is working? The recent poll suggested a large majority would be happy with a full migration to Yahoo, but we seem to now have a very messy split with postings in either place or both. Personally I think we need to either: (a) Keep day-to-day posts on Blacksheep and use the Yahoo group *just* as an LF/MF/VLF archiving facility where links, schematics, pictures and screenshots etc can be kept for the long-term i.e. *not* post day-to-day sked type messages on Yahoo. or (b) Fully migrate to Yahoo and close the Blacksheep reflector. We all want the best way of communicating LF/MF/VLF news and information and we also want the ability to archive important and helpful data for newcomers and history. As long as this is achieved most of us don't mind how. I proposed a full move to a Yahoo group as it allows both quick email type messaging and archiving. IMHO this is still the better option, but it is not my place to dictate what experienced LFers prefer. * *Constructive and helpful comments please. 73s Roger G3XBM -- http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ http://qss2.blogspot.com/ --047d7b33d5bed055d904c3117d8c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Just wondering how people think the current set-up is working? The recent p= oll suggested a large majority would be happy with a full migration to Yaho= o, but we seem to now have a very messy split with postings in either place= or both.

Personally I think we need to either:

(a) Keep day-to-day posts= on Blacksheep and use the Yahoo group just as an=20 LF/MF/VLF archiving facility where links, schematics, pictures and screensh= ots etc can be kept for the long-term i.e. not post day-to-day sked type=20 messages on Yahoo.

or

(b) Fully migrate to Yahoo and close th= e Blacksheep reflector.

We all want the best way of communicating LF/MF/VLF news and information and we also want the ability to archive important and helpful data for=20 newcomers and history. As long as this is achieved most of us don't min= d how.

I proposed a full move to a Yahoo group as it allows both qui= ck email type messaging and archiving. IMHO this is still the better option= , but it is not my place to dictate what experienced LFers prefer.

Constructive and helpful comments please.

73s
Roger G3= XBM

--
<= a href=3D"http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/" target=3D"_blank">http://g3xbm-qr= p.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/
http://qss2.blogspot.com/

--047d7b33d5bed055d904c3117d8c--