Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id F244538000082; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 09:57:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SbBIy-0007wo-2b for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 14:57:16 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SbBIx-0007wf-Ig for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 14:57:15 +0100 Received: from mail-ob0-f171.google.com ([209.85.214.171]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SbBIv-0001Ya-G4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 14:57:14 +0100 Received: by obfk16 with SMTP id k16so14400611obf.16 for ; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 06:57:11 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=googlemail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=7DKgnagZhUs9Beb5oMZXsIJUwlcDL+9pMvpjVM4ZnyE=; b=ON9lzxgV27C4JgzjjMzx4/dskLHOsEjbL7sUYIuGm3YPOm2ID+1ia2I1sJ1KwO8vNq ysl3xnTB/Pjkikm3669Y1sHZzaLgN9dUAzSmE0Cl0AoLFakIm8QsxghobnhcKUuFA89v XDRFKGq70+kEZkISeE/Etfe2XvydiAMayamV6DRiokaPEV8PirFeA1OEH7fW3wZkt68e jh49kwLbr+Vk8PSdqozUMgVEzuzV+s3jnlXd2BaBobYldEJCRz6BPxfnGD53O/UMB7Qq J90vxHtDSETgVfsgLWY3ZbHYm0eqcAbCJXJM77XpRMmyzBMrzKcY/Xg6hnuQO0rnZzJC Dngg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.207.98 with SMTP id lv2mr3037375obc.13.1338731831351; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 06:57:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.8.68 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 06:57:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 14:57:11 +0100 Message-ID: From: John Gould To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I've put up a poll on the Yahoo! Group version to see whether there is a clear view on the way forward. I thought that there was, but there seem to still be some with concerns. I personally don't want to have two groups, which is why I didn't support a move to Yahoo! Groups earlier; I thought from what I had read on the list that there were lots of people wanting to take advantage of the Yahoo! Groups offering. Since many of us have had the chance to try out Yahoo! Groups and it offers polling tool I thought it would be worthwhile seeing what the preference is for the way forward. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.214.171 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (johngould88[at]googlemail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (johngould88[at]googlemail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 420019f4991fbaa4f653703c21f48617 Subject: LF: Poll announcement Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f5024ea41dacd04c191cbb4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_60_70, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:486615520:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m414.1 ; domain : googlemail.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60174fcb6d641124 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --e89a8f5024ea41dacd04c191cbb4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I've put up a poll on the Yahoo! Group version to see whether there is a clear view on the way forward. I thought that there was, but there seem to still be some with concerns. I personally don't want to have two groups, which is why I didn't support a move to Yahoo! Groups earlier; I thought from what I had read on the list that there were lots of people wanting to take advantage of the Yahoo! Groups offering. Since many of us have had the chance to try out Yahoo! Groups and it offers polling tool I thought it would be worthwhile seeing what the preference is for the way forward. For those not currently members of the Yahoo! Group list you will of course have to join in order to vote, but at least this is how you can exercise your right to vote (and leave afterwards, if you wish). The detail of the poll, which I've set to close next Sunday is as follow: Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the rsgb_lf_group group: Now that you've had a chance to try the Yahoo! Groups list, how do you want to continue? o With the Yahoo! Groups list o With the Blacksheep.org list o Both lists To vote, please visit the following web page: http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/rsgb_lf_group/surveys?id=13140385 Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups web site listed above. Thanks! 73 John, G3WKL --e89a8f5024ea41dacd04c191cbb4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I've put up a poll on the Yahoo! Group v= ersion to see whether there is a clear view on the way forward. =A0I though= t that there was, but there seem to still be some with concerns. =A0 I pers= onally don't want to have two groups, which is why I didn't support= a move to Yahoo! Groups earlier; I thought from what I had read on the lis= t that there were lots of people wanting to take advantage of the Yahoo! Gr= oups offering. =A0Since many of us have had the chance to try out Yahoo! Gr= oups and it offers polling tool I thought it would be worthwhile seeing wha= t the preference is for the way forward. =A0

For those not currently members of the Yahoo! Group list you will of co= urse have to join in order to vote, but at least this is how you can exerci= se your right to vote (and leave afterwards, if you wish).

The detail of the poll, which I've set to close next Sunday is as f= ollow:

<= div>
Enter your vote today! A new pol= l has been created for the
rsgb_lf_group group:
Now that you've had a= chance to try the Yahoo! Groups list,
how do you want to continue?

o With the Yahoo! Groups = list
o With the Blacksheep.org list
o Both lists


To vote, please visit the= following web page:
http:/= /uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/rsgb_lf_group/surveys?id=3D13140385

Note: Please do not reply= to this message. Poll votes are
not collected via email. To vote, you must go to = the Yahoo! Groups
web site listed above.

Thanks!


73 John, G3WKL
--e89a8f5024ea41dacd04c191cbb4--