Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 1B01F38000093; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 09:35:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Skxor-0006hL-Ui for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 14:34:37 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Skxor-0006hC-As for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 14:34:37 +0100 Received: from nm2.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([77.238.189.59]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Skxop-0005xt-D0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 14:34:36 +0100 Received: from [77.238.189.51] by nm2.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Jun 2012 13:34:34 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.225] by tm4.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Jun 2012 13:34:34 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1002.bt.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Jun 2012 13:34:34 -0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=btopenworld.com Result=Signature OK X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 326749.2766.bm@omp1002.bt.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 22519 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2012 13:34:34 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=tlbswMpKAOY3nL+3SRy9vhZMw7TrGMxxTCgvgsBd4zJUMhjAUqf0N/w9btGk6SyhXJCc7U8NS2z3RMgTC+xj2MeM7ekp5wjM9QJDKYvUJWOI2jRukJNagTyJ+CHekPcyQJMh3rB67vXqJ5Magyy7OQ3lZZRTXTJPqnfu6PojVmc= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=s1024; t=1341063274; bh=MACL9cBsSSihN/eqoKUqYLuI/MTlF1mAnUHx3zXLv54=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=1kxLwH3GE94hIZMJODy0pfptzAlIIuDF1/ZOwC9vF+1LyUhF/9K/NjhLM1Ux1MsaCwOnm8napHGePopUFAGHhO8POnoiN4HId0/eLLxL3OobYyMDQOgGP4RJloj3FLpPvVeHreVuUAfx8Z2YyMP4FDEyToSZg16jVpXWR4OFj80= X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: OaHkG1gVM1mqZqiSHTRrZL8b.mChA_16JyulveOKvYzyNW7 l6GG1FfLUpvxJ5DpWUIKl0t5HBh482Yd16Ng.TqTy256D3vcPRw0Yj14Xs5q DFuscRC.TkHRaIEzhjwyqC.X1YK39W4g2WaF2iRMrfAVGnogpEmQtbaVMmLt yEMzYfFwnpQX_6mYx4G4m7sgyafJJ6i15Hf4VNdu.tmhta7Dw4dOTW316uVQ eaiKntfTzdBgi35NvaavKAIbQu9lU97Z68sVD8.oqgJ5vOPSIGaW.CoiCJRT GSjTayJTBV.Hbwkw93zxEd6Ef3TznzB49G.NDsLC4lG7l9hkZ6ej1eYZaijU 5ZPvxSoHyLKQkf.WBEvSoVNONC0oB6zcNPlGV3ulDGQp0fA19_p0wQmROIDy TxNwm6NEtwoFIudQzzp1_bCLt0Y58ru4YkuWKi.4uMYIphHr4TYjqpbgkUwl QrmeKBLv9R9JP351SCrGHxT.FekK406hIzZ.lhsjlON9fmTpiMSoK3UcP.I_ Usp8PPUsY X-Yahoo-SMTP: Cxhli3eswBD1ozmtAojhjrja86kWx0Qm9tycD5QR1DKWrOLgjJcXkw-- Received: from JimPC (james.moritz@86.185.202.35 with login) by smtp827.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Jun 2012 06:34:34 -0700 PDT Message-ID: <9D7027FC8EB24E65A26395BA5439B7A1@JimPC> From: "James Moritz" To: References: <4FEE0F7E.2090109@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <0F87F4C0AE524B1E9EA631C81D579573@gnat> <4FEE3A73.1090602@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FEEF036.4020702@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <4FEEF036.4020702@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 14:34:42 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18463 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dear Stefan, LF Group, >So, is a microphone effect possible? I suppose it is possible, but I don't think there are many intense accoustic sources of 473kHz, and in any case the filter assembly would have to be designed to minimise unwanted acoustic coupling between input and output, so would probably also give good protection from external sources. The ferrite transformer core in your PA is perhaps the strongest source, but I guess you won't use the PA and filter at the same time ;-) [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [77.238.189.59 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines X-Scan-Signature: 7001055fa59a9c23b9831ea6d317a074 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Help needed, mechanical filters Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-15"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:454566848:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m271.2 ; domain : btopenworld.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db4074fef00a94b7f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Dear Stefan, LF Group, >So, is a microphone effect possible? I suppose it is possible, but I don't think there are many intense accoustic sources of 473kHz, and in any case the filter assembly would have to be designed to minimise unwanted acoustic coupling between input and output, so would probably also give good protection from external sources. The ferrite transformer core in your PA is perhaps the strongest source, but I guess you won't use the PA and filter at the same time ;-) >Good idea about the matching! So it is about like the input filter of >JA8SCD's LF converter: >http://icas.to/idc-136-kit/idc-136-kit-manual-eng.pdf (page 6 of 6). That's one possibility - the "dual" of that circuit has a capacitor in series with the low-Z source and a shunt capacitor across the winding - see the handbooks. >According to the data sheet, the insertion loss (Durchlassdämpfung) is < 2 >dB. So if one uses a well matched 50 Ohm transmit antenna and a RX with 50 >Ohm input, i think no additional gain is needed. If the receiver sensitivity is reasonably good (it might not be though...), you could probably allow 10 or 20dB attenuation. You could reduce the effect of impedance variations with an attenuator pad, etc. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU