Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A97A138000089; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:36:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ShPkA-0003w8-55 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 19:35:06 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ShPk9-0003vz-Nm for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 19:35:05 +0100 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1ShPk8-0005XO-3R for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 19:35:04 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.197] (77-21-14-177-dynip.superkabel.de [77.21.14.177]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap3) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MHYWy-1Skib43jxc-003K2y; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 20:35:03 +0200 References: <4FE06941.6020404@kabelmail.de> From: Holger 'Geri' DK8KW DI2BO W1KW X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9A405) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <89E2A86B-68F6-4FEF-B0D2-85147A742918@dk8kw.de> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 20:34:52 +0200 To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:4JI7xbToHeUaJhVZHet/mCQy4ipwH4gnWMetMO6Zjqq P8ESGZUWFXVdBi7E4uiIRM5eO9/MCfvB9NldLkHmt7BnQHaphW 0fkQykr6Wf1DNLzfXquGEjuW8wrh5WR2tHKyCZzpc82O/1Boki ESHK9k6pedWJ+vW19uifWcJ3O7oU9crTKl/eFJ6n+3rp1y6CyJ U288NjJZSj5bJLkIPDi5qyJHrzynOzBPKhoJ0KALep7f8a/RYK hMwMFzcOBRKBd9JAWwa+6OzqDO4E9qiNo/B7CEjGbyz2usPcgb A8O+GNAFsDS07jkTuJZk9xLH8SUtOT+hp+R9T4Jmjch+RCvsP9 KJACESPu79Utlg5PUL484UG2S4Y6hvfgR1xvggHjY X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Horst, On 20.06.2012, at 09:54, "Horst Stöcker" wrote: > Just 1W ERP - this will be also the maximum power after the full implementation of WRC2012 in 2013. I got this information also by the BNetzA. What was the maximum power in WRC2012? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.227.126.171 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.0 T_FRT_STOCK2 BODY: ReplaceTags: Stock (2) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 MIME_QP_LONG_LINE RAW: Quoted-printable line longer than 76 chars X-Scan-Signature: ac0f6ff1af52b6036ac1f4fe0c2bd52c Subject: Re: Aw: LF: Text of MF-Allocation to German Hams Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-B3CA21D0-2BC1-4DDC-B8BD-E915392CBFC7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:390955232:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408d4fe218224caf X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --Apple-Mail-B3CA21D0-2BC1-4DDC-B8BD-E915392CBFC7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hello Horst, On 20.06.2012, at 09:54, "Horst St=C3=B6cker" wrote:= > Just 1W ERP - this will be also the maximum power after the full implement= ation of WRC2012 in 2013. I got this information also by the BNetzA. What wa= s the maximum power in WRC2012? WRC2012 allocation: 1 Watt EIRP or under speciai conditions: up to 5 Watt EI= RP. Today we got 1 Watt ERP =3D 1.64 Watt EIRP, which is already 1/3 of the maxi= mum permissible. With 100 Watt TX out, 2 Amperes antenna current and and 17m Umbrella antenna= I got a measured ERP of 0.4 Watt (=3D0.7 Watt EIRP).=20 I can't see any reason to complain. Vy 73 Geri, DK8KW & DI2BO --Apple-Mail-B3CA21D0-2BC1-4DDC-B8BD-E915392CBFC7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8

Hello Horst,

On 20.06.2012, at 09:54, "Horst St=C3=B6ck= er" <horst.stoecker@web.de&g= t; wrote:

Just 1W ERP - this will be al= so the maximum power after the full implementation of WRC2012 in 2013. I got= this information also by the BNetzA. What was the maximum power in WRC2012?=

WRC2012 allocation: 1 Watt EIRP or u= nder speciai conditions: up to 5 Watt EIRP.

Today w= e got 1 Watt ERP =3D 1.64 Watt EIRP, which is already 1/3 of the maximum per= missible.

With 100 Watt TX out, 2 Amperes antenna c= urrent and and 17m Umbrella antenna I got a measured ERP of 0.4 Watt (=3D0.7= Watt EIRP). 

I can't see any reason to compla= in.


Vy 73

G= eri, DK8KW & DI2BO

= --Apple-Mail-B3CA21D0-2BC1-4DDC-B8BD-E915392CBFC7--