Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5662E380000BF; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:54:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ShRuU-0004bh-Tr for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 21:53:54 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ShRuU-0004bY-Di for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 21:53:54 +0100 Received: from rhcavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.130] helo=cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1ShRuS-0006VA-Fq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 21:53:53 +0100 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: B476A128044.AE119 X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (icts-p-smtps-1e.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.33]) by cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B476A128044 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:53:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ICTS-S-HUB3.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-hub3.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.9.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B50BD4042 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:53:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::312b:f3bc:9c4:4ebb]) by ICTS-S-HUB3.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::a470:76b3:406d:2b1a%27]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:53:41 +0200 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Thread-Topic: LF: RE: Test signal needed Thread-Index: AQHNTm2qQZOgOTnwJESB0XzNInVbIJcCvQ8XgACQ+ACAAGIrNg== Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 20:53:40 +0000 Message-ID: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FAB1DE5@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> References: <4FE0ED02.4080903@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>,<4FE0EF87.8060905@kpnmail.nl> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FAB195C@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be>,<4FE100DB.60809@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FAB1C6F@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be>,<4FE201B2.6030102@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <4FE201B2.6030102@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-US Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.112.13.14] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 134.58.240.130 (rhcavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be) used invalid HELO/EHLO cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be - verification failed X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, a step attenuator may be a good solution in order to adjust the signal levels deênding on QRM / QRN / signal. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [134.58.240.130 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 20fb97b64762a0bd80c12a4b2f6724b0 Subject: RE: LF: RE: Test signal needed Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:497934144:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608a4fe2389b24fd X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Stefan, a step attenuator may be a good solution in order to adjust the signal leve= ls de=EAnding on QRM / QRN / signal. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ________________________________________ Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= ] namens Stefan Sch=E4fer [Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de] Verzonden: woensdag 20 juni 2012 19:00 Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Onderwerp: Re: LF: RE: Test signal needed Hi Rik, Am 20.06.2012 08:28, schrieb Rik Strobbe: > About the TX antenna used as RX antenna: that often works fine if you do = not overload the RX (BC at 525kHz+). I always use the 20dB attenuator of my= good old TS440 to RX on my 11m high / 25m ling Lazy-L antenna. Well, didn't measured yet but i think the transmit antenna is very selective too. Anyway the signal levels may be to high in the near BC region. I've checked the filter curves in my small active antennas. Both, the ferrite and the E field antenna are resonated, the E field antenna uses a L to ground in front of the first gate. These are the curves: Active ferrite antenna: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/MFferrite.png Active E field antenna: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/MFactiveE.png The main aspect is to filter DLF at 153 kHz which causes much trouble here... Also my receiver is selective it selfe. As i said, 500 kHz is already 30 dB down... > As long as the band noise is above the RX noise you won't loose any sen= sititity. > That's clear. But "band noise" is not so easy to find here. It's always the question what the man made noise part is. However this seems to be less critical on MF than on LF, as others already said.. 73, tnx, cu Stefan/DK7FC > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T > ________________________________________ > Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.o= rg] namens Stefan Sch=E4fer [Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de] > Verzonden: woensdag 20 juni 2012 0:44 > Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Onderwerp: LF: Test signal needed > > Rik, MF, > > Right now i'm testing the TX antenna as a RX antenna. This works much > better than expected. A 10 dB attenuator is needed but no problem. Maybe > you can give me a test signal again on 502 kHz, or someone else? > > It looks like the QRN is much lower on that antenna. That means that > many of the crashes during my CQ calls have been charged rain drops that > were falling on the E field probe, just my guess. > > I will listen another 20 min. on 502 kHz and apprechiate any test > signals from amateurs. > > 73, Stefan > > Am 19.06.2012 23:53, schrieb Rik Strobbe: > >> actually 501.2kHz. >> Stefan, I have replied to your CQ several times, but no luck. >> You are 579 with the usual QSB. >> I am running 150W into a 11m high / 25m long lazy-L antenna, estimared E= RP abt 1W. >> >> 73, Rik ON7YD >> >> ________________________________________ >> Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.= org] namens pa3abk [pa3abk@kpnmail.nl] >> Verzonden: dinsdag 19 juni 2012 23:30 >> Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Onderwerp: Re: LF: CQ on 476.5 kHz CW >> >> Lsn fer OR7T on 502 pse >> Jan/pa3abk >> >> On 19-6-2012 23:20, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: >> >> >>> just in case someone wants... >>> I will call until 22 UT if no one replies... >>> >>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >>> >>> >>> >>> >> -- >> pa3abk<-> dordrecht jo21it >> >>=