Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 1CD1838000092; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:14:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Sg1F5-0001uN-Qa for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 23:13:15 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Sg1F5-0001uE-7D for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 23:13:15 +0100 Received: from rhcavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.129] helo=cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Sg1F2-0004Cr-Tq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 23:13:14 +0100 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: 36D5B138097.A5E3E X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from icts-p-smtps-2.cc.kuleuven.be (icts-p-smtps-2e.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.34]) by cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D5B138097 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:13:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ICTS-S-HUB4.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-hub4.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.9.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by icts-p-smtps-2.cc.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32E8420041 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:13:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::312b:f3bc:9c4:4ebb]) by ICTS-S-HUB4.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::c11b:83f0:c46c:c366%26]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:13:08 +0200 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Thread-Topic: LF: CW on 477.5 kHz Thread-Index: AQHNS/tV+uTyS0xTRU2djIHcF/gcg5b9RxaAgAAEx4CAAAdWAIAAC7aAgAAjJeM= Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 22:13:08 +0000 Message-ID: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FAAE508@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> References: <4FDCE611.7070004@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FDCEF47.9050805@kpnmail.nl> <4FDCF349.5060100@kpnmail.nl> ,<4FDD0343.3070901@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <4FDD0343.3070901@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-US Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.112.13.12] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 134.58.240.129 (rhcavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be) used invalid HELO/EHLO cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be - verification failed X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan, you were 579 here with the typical 500kHz QSB. Due to strong rain I couldn't call you, but I assume we will have a QSO in the near future. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [134.58.240.129 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: d2a449809c9c1ff1983612d049372878 Subject: RE: LF: CW on 477.5 kHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FAAE508ICTSSMBX5lunaku_" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:428998048:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d64fdd052a2934 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FAAE508ICTSSMBX5lunaku_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan, you were 579 here with the typical 500kHz QSB. Due to strong rain I couldn't call you, but I assume we will have a QSO in = the near future. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ________________________________ Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= ] namens Stefan Sch=E4fer [Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de] Verzonden: zondag 17 juni 2012 0:05 Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Onderwerp: Re: LF: CW on 477.5 kHz Thank you Jan for the QSO, Chris and all the others for the many reports my= email. Yes, it was a historic moment for me! The first amateur radio station i eve= r heared on MF (except 160m of course). The QSO was like on HF, without any= problems! I can well imagine that this is a CW band where real time QSOs c= an take place. And this night is in summer and with high QRN, so winther mu= st be wonderful. No contest stress like on HF and still a special place below 1 MHz :-) 137 = kHz is the real challenge of course but its very nice to have a real QSO ba= nd now! I will go on to improve some things here and will see how the active ferrit= e antenna performs on MF, maybe cancelling out the QRN... The QSB was interesting and it clearly shows up that the ground range dista= nce is much lower. I got audible copy from the UK but nothing at DJ2LF in 1= 75km distance... Will continue to listen and prepare my remote link to key the PA here while= sitting in the forest and receiving there :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 16.06.2012 23:24, schrieb Chris 4X1RF: Jan, Stefan Congratulations for your 477.5 / 502 KHz QSO! It was fun to hear it in real= time on the Delfi WebSdr. 73s Chris 4X1RF On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 11:57 PM, pa3abk > wrote: Stefan, At the mom I'll will call you on 502kHz everytime you stop your CQ. And stop when your CQ starts again. There's some QSB on it but have peaks in the region of 4-5. Jan/pa3abk On 16-6-2012 22:40, pa3abk wrote: Stefan, Can you indicate were you listen in your CQ call? At te mom you are becoming better. Jan/pa3abk On 16-6-2012 22:01, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: MF, Now my RX and active antenna is much better after adding a band filter in f= ront of the first gate. Most probably there was an overload of the input be= fore. Now DLF is 40 dB attenuated and the RX performs much better. I can he= ar the crashes / sferics and see several traces, still not sure if they are= local QRM or a far field signal. My TX is ready as well. I will *call CQ on 477.5 kHz in CW and l= ook for skeds*! I can receive on 505 kHz (arround) as well but my filters i= n the RX already attenuate the region by about 20 dB... Anyway worth a try. Starting now! 73, Stefan/DK7FC -- pa3abk<-> dordrecht jo21it --_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FAAE508ICTSSMBX5lunaku_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Stefan,

 

you were 579=  here with the typical 500kHz QSB.

Due to strong<= a> rain I couldn't call you,=  but I assume we will have a QSO in the near future.

 

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [o= wner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens Stefan Sch=E4fer [Stefan.Schaefer= @iup.uni-heidelberg.de]
Verzonden: zondag 17 juni 2012 0:05
Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Onderwerp: Re: LF: CW on 477.5 kHz

Thank you Jan for the QSO, Chris and all the others for the many repor= ts my email.

Yes, it was a historic moment for me! The first amateur radio station i eve= r heared on MF (except 160m of course). The QSO was like on HF, without any= problems! I can well imagine that this is a CW band where real time QSOs c= an take place. And this night is in summer and with high QRN, so winther must be wonderful.
No contest stress like on HF and still a special place below 1 MHz :-) 137 = kHz is the real challenge of course but its very nice to have a real QSO ba= nd now!

I will go on to improve some things here and will see how the active ferrit= e antenna performs on MF, maybe cancelling out the QRN...

The QSB was interesting and it clearly shows up that the ground range dista= nce is much lower. I got audible copy from the UK but nothing at DJ2LF in 1= 75km distance...
Will continue to listen and prepare my remote link to key the PA here while= sitting in the forest and receiving there :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 16.06.2012 23:24, schrieb Chris 4X1RF:
Jan, Stefan

Congratulations for your 477.5 / 502 KHz QSO! It was fun to hear it in real= time on the Delfi WebSdr.


73s
Chris 4X1RF


On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 11:57 PM, pa3abk <pa3abk@kpnmail.n= l> wrote:
Stefan,

At the mom I'll will call you on 502kHz everytime you stop your CQ.
And stop when your CQ starts again.

There's some QSB on it but have peaks in the region of 4-5.


Jan/pa3abk


On 16-6-2012 22:40, pa3abk wrote:
Stefan,

Can you indicate were you listen in your CQ call?

At te mom you are becoming better.



Jan/pa3abk

On 16-6-2012 22:01, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote:
MF,

Now my RX and active antenna is much better after adding a band filter in f= ront of the first gate. Most probably there was an overload of the input be= fore. Now DLF is 40 dB attenuated and the RX performs much better. I can he= ar the crashes / sferics and see several traces, still not sure if they are local QRM or a far field signal= .

My TX is ready as well. I will *call CQ on 477.5 kHz in CW and look for skeds*! I can receive on 505 kHz (arround)= as well but my filters in the RX already attenuate the region by about 20 = dB... Anyway worth a try.

Starting now!

73, Stefan/DK7FC




--
pa3abk<->  dordrecht jo21it



--_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FAAE508ICTSSMBX5lunaku_--