Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 15D3638000083; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 09:09:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SbAXo-0007VG-3D for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 14:08:32 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SbAXn-0007V7-Kb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 14:08:31 +0100 Received: from rhcavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.129] helo=cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SbAXm-0001NG-0v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 14:08:30 +0100 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: A5612138097.A3FE7 X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (icts-p-smtps-1e.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.33]) by cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5612138097; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 15:08:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ICTS-S-HUB1.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-hub1.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.9.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2B5C4042; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 15:08:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::312b:f3bc:9c4:4ebb]) by ICTS-S-HUB1.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::f5f7:d8cc:bee0:28d3%26]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 15:08:27 +0200 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" , "rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk" Thread-Topic: LF: O.T.: Reflector status Thread-Index: AQHNQX+q+yvK9kJcl0KfwAuoBCL5H5boZScAgAAlz8SAAAEeWA== Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 13:08:26 +0000 Message-ID: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0C685D0D@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> References: <4FCB225B.7020209@legal-medicine.de><4FCB47D9.9030800@iup.uni-heidelberg.de><4FCB4FAE.5070300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> ,<005301cd4186$b18cf300$1502a8c0@Clemens04> In-Reply-To: <005301cd4186$b18cf300$1502a8c0@Clemens04> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-US Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.112.13.14] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 134.58.240.129 (rhcavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be) used invalid HELO/EHLO cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be - verification failed X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dear members of the old and new rsgb_lf_group reflectors, my motto is "live and let live". In my opinion the new (yahoogroups) reflector is better. As mentioned before nobody is forced to visit the website and deal with the adds. Just digest the messages by e-mail (as I do). [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [134.58.240.129 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: b08ad821341ca291e1fd930f7b9292d3 Subject: RE: LF: O.T.: Reflector status Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0C685D0DICTSSMBX5lunaku_" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:144582336:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600e4fcb61f8563d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0C685D0DICTSSMBX5lunaku_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear members of the old and new rsgb_lf_group reflectors, my motto is "live and let live". In my opinion the new (yahoogroups) reflector is better. As mentioned befor= e nobody is forced to visit the website and deal with the adds. Just digest= the messages by e-mail (as I do). BUT ... Why closing down the old (blacksheep) reflector? It is clear that a numbers= of members just want to stay there and for whatever reasons do not like ya= hoogroups. Anyone is free to join either one of the refelctors (and miss a part of the= fun) or both (and receive some messages double). Meanwhile it is clear that there are strong opinions about this. Repeating = them over and over will hardly make someone to change his mind, it will onl= y cause irritation. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T --_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0C685D0DICTSSMBX5lunaku_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear members= of the old and new rsgb_lf_group reflectors= ,

 

my motto is "l= ive and let live".

In my opinion the new (yahoogroups) reflector is better. As mentioned before nobody is forced to visit= the website and deal with the adds. Just di= gest the messages by e-mail (as I do).

BUT ...

Why closing = down the old (blacksheep) reflector? It is&n= bsp;clear that a numbers of members<= /a> just want to stay there and&nb= sp;for whatever reasons do not like yahoogroups.

Anyone is free to&n= bsp;join either one of the refelct= ors (and miss a part of the fun) or both<= /a> (and receive some messages double).=

Meanwhile it= is clear that there are strong=  opinions about this. Repeating<= /a> them over and over will hardly = ;make someone to change his mind, it wil= l only cause irritation.

 

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

--_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0C685D0DICTSSMBX5lunaku_--