Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id AC7E03800008C; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 09:35:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Sft8W-0006NR-Qz for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:33:56 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Sft8W-0006NI-4b for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:33:56 +0100 Received: from smtpout1.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.29] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Sft8U-00026I-LS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:33:55 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.26.28.207]) by mwinf5d08 with ME id P1Zt1j0044U6hVe031ZtVf; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:33:53 +0200 Message-ID: <7AA545D0B9B44457A27CDF46205D3600@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <2C0E979FCD1845DC8B3CA6CBBED621F0@AGB> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FAAD50C@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> <4FDB065C.8060202@xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <4FDB065C.8060202@xs4all.nl> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:33:53 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120616-0, 16/06/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: So far 477 may be a good spot , beacons on 477 , but if the max mod frequency is 1010 Hz , that puts Op HF of the side bands ? wspr 477.600 , to use the top 200 Hz ? This 'new' band is not very comfortable : ( [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: e90dcb17768c7e768f13e0721cc1c0c7 Subject: Re: LF: RE: New Opera QRG for 472 Khz Band ?? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc1494fdc8b9068aa X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none So far 477 may be a good spot , beacons on 477 , but if the max mod frequency is 1010 Hz , that puts Op HF of the side bands ? wspr 477.600 , to use the top 200 Hz ? This 'new' band is not very comfortable : ( G.. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Albert" Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 10:54 AM To: Subject: Re: LF: RE: New Opera QRG for 472 Khz Band ?? > G, > > Just to start the discussion, my proposal is dial 477 kHz. > > 73, Albert > > >