Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dg06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id EA4C53800008C; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 11:57:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SbZdo-0005Bl-70 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 16:56:24 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SbZdn-0005Bc-L6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 16:56:23 +0100 Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SbZdl-0007UG-8d for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 16:56:22 +0100 Received: by wibhn14 with SMTP id hn14so2475272wib.10 for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 08:56:19 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:references:from:content-type:x-mailer:in-reply-to :message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=DLadr592gg8YD38GIdb+/9bPlBuGuvlbUJ7T19apX+A=; b=RIUPBTn32i+Sa2w5pWbO6XM27GGtLxQYUX4PdTzgnueOCInui8XjWFCQfZ8897+T+h eM+fMlVBdxwK4N8aoeWMSuIZ5vNElYlRT6+Aed7pV5hwhidhNqnS2hCzDf52HEG5gBsT e85LBz1GlVpsVzT3Z7sFq/zE+OchZxvxBwfPpfETmeedGAugdNo9TWbZ3l4mtpzXKOqq UzIqBMjV+Nv5CaDVpQFBxAUeLpDspyX1slw8NmzD3Yfym3seUCmf05ZgaQTdE6PkPVNv 4yzt6SXsDlPfPnKyk5oNLACAKvP5IB3vuc8bF8YVh907soWfEAmjUnWMut9aAvD3oSXY 9/Fw== Received: by 10.216.227.101 with SMTP id c79mr11559794weq.188.1338825379602; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 08:56:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (cpc6-cmbg17-2-0-cust624.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com. [86.30.58.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gv4sm33451919wib.8.2012.06.04.08.56.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 04 Jun 2012 08:56:18 -0700 (PDT) References: <4FCB96A9.4010009@usa.net> <4FCB9F34.7040604@legal-medicine.de> <4FCBCC8B.9050308@usa.net> <77A08BCA-E9AB-404B-B425-BFD3564F66FE@thelortons.co.uk> <517B3527-8D27-4E07-853D-653F9AF3E025@thelortons.co.uk> <4FCCCB31.4080201@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> From: Roger Lapthorn X-Mailer: iPod Mail (9B206) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <724246DE-DF76-46E2-84A3-1580A566C9E5@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 16:56:13 +0100 To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dear Stefan, If you visit the group website the poll button is on the left. Press it, vote and leave thereafter. But I am still puzzled why you really have such an aversion to Yahoo Groups which thousands of hams have used happily and freely for years. They are a GOOD resource. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.212.181 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rogerlapthorn[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: d63ea50e288c5ecb9bd7a86eeabe94f2 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Black Sheep Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-A6956337-3533-4FA0-AAD9-3BE026D60FA3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:483958656:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m013.1 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d410e4fccdadb4b43 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --Apple-Mail-A6956337-3533-4FA0-AAD9-3BE026D60FA3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Dear Stefan, If you visit the group website the poll button is on the left. Press it, vot= e and leave thereafter. But I am still puzzled why you really have such an a= version to Yahoo Groups which thousands of hams have used happily and freely= for years. They are a GOOD resource.=20 Dear Mal, This all started as a simple suggestion of mine: Yahoo Groups offer everythi= ng this reflector has (speed,email flash messages etc) and so yet much more t= oo. I had NO wish to create a problem, especially with good people like Ste= fan who I greatly respect. I have never sought conflict and certainly my vie= ws on moderation have been totally misrepresented. Please, can we cool it? John (G3WKL),=20 I am rapidly losing the will to live :-) . Like me, you have only been tryin= g to do the best for LFers, including finding new ways to share knowledge an= d data with newcomers. I am so sorry this has become so contentious.=20 73s Roger=20 -- Via my 2.4GHz transceiver -- On 4 Jun 2012, at 16:03, John Gould wrote: > Stefan, >=20 > I not sure that you are correct in saying that one needs a yahoo account. = I've subscribed to Yahoo! Groups with my Gmail account and that worked OK, s= o you should be able to join the RSGB_LF_Group with your Heidelberg e-mail a= ccount, wait for the membership to be authorised by one of the moderators, v= ote and then un-subscribe. =20 >=20 > I've not run a poll on this list - it was so easy to set up a poll on the o= ther group that everyone can see who voted and how they voted. =20 >=20 > 73 John, G3WKL >=20 > On 4 June 2012 15:50, Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer wrote: > Hi Clive, LF, >=20 > For those who simply subscribed to the list but without having a yahoo acc= ount it is not possible to vote! This situation is advantaging the pro-yahoo= party. Please remind those who are blind for such facts that there are furt= her members (outside the poll) who want to codeterminate in this process. >=20 > My vote is pro blacksheep and i would agree with the 2 group compromise. A= s long as the two groups are not treated like competitors, where one has to w= in and the other will be shut down after some time. >=20 > 73, Stefan/DK7FC >=20 > Am 04.06.2012 13:15, schrieb Clive Lorton: > If you have voted it is possible to change your vote before the voting per= iod ends. > =20 >=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail-A6956337-3533-4FA0-AAD9-3BE026D60FA3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Dear Stefan,
If y= ou visit the group website the poll button is on the left. Press it, vote an= d leave thereafter. But I am still puzzled why you really have such an avers= ion to Yahoo Groups which thousands of hams have used happily and freely for= years. They are a GOOD resource. 

Dear Mal,
This all started as a simple suggestion of mine: Yahoo Groups offer= everything this reflector has (speed,email flash messages etc) and so yet m= uch more too.  I had NO wish to create a problem, especially with good p= eople like Stefan who I greatly respect. I have never sought conflict and ce= rtainly my views on moderation have been totally misrepresented. Please, can= we cool it?

John (G3WKL), 
I am rap= idly losing the will to live :-) . Like me, you have only been trying to do t= he best for LFers, including finding new ways to share knowledge and data wi= th newcomers. I am so sorry this has become so contentious. 
=
73s
Roger 

-- Via my 2.4GHz transceiver= --

On 4 Jun 2012, at 16:03, John Gould <johngould88@googlemail.com> wrote:
Stefan,

= I not sure that you are correct in saying that one needs a yahoo account. &n= bsp;I've subscribed to Yahoo! Groups with my Gmail account and that worked O= K, so you should be able to join the RSGB_LF_Group with your Heidelberg e-ma= il account, wait for the membership to be authorised by one of the moderator= s, vote and then un-subscribe.  

I've not run a poll on this list - it was so easy to set= up a poll on the other group that everyone can see who voted and how they v= oted.  

73 John, G3WKL

On 4 June 2012 15:50, Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer <Stefan.Schaef= er@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote:
Hi Clive, LF,

For those who simply subscribed to the list but without having a yahoo accou= nt it is not possible to vote! This situation is advantaging the pro-yahoo p= arty. Please remind those who are blind for such facts that there are furthe= r members (outside the poll) who want to codeterminate in this process.

My vote is pro blacksheep and i would agree with the 2 group compromise. As l= ong as the two groups are not treated like competitors, where one has to win= and the other will be shut down after some time.

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 04.06.2012 13:15, schrieb Clive Lorton:
If you have voted it is possible to change your vote before the voting perio= d ends.
 


= --Apple-Mail-A6956337-3533-4FA0-AAD9-3BE026D60FA3--