Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C85D13800008E; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 08:14:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Sb9gp-0006mO-Ej for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 13:13:47 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Sb9go-0006mB-W7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 13:13:46 +0100 Received: from smtpout6.laposte.net ([193.253.67.231] helo=smtpout.laposte.net) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb9gm-00016q-KD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 13:13:45 +0100 Received: from wwinf8314 ([10.99.54.221]) by mwinf8511-out with ME id HoDj1j0054mN4ju03oDjdt; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 14:13:43 +0200 Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 14:13:43 +0200 From: "manginbenoit.pro" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <641574525.17553.1338725623359.JavaMail.www@wwinf8314> In-Reply-To: <4FCB4FAE.5070300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> References: <4FCB225B.7020209@legal-medicine.de>, <4FCB47D9.9030800@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FCB4FAE.5070300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [82.246.206.85] X-Wum-Nature: EMAIL-NATURE X-WUM-FROM: |~| X-WUM-TO: |~| X-WUM-REPLYTO: |~| X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: That's a thing of beauty Stefan ! So what is going on ? Is it only because a few people think this reflector is old-fashioned and want it QRT that it is bound to happen ? Is it : " I don't use, I destroy" ? If you don't want it, siply don't use it. But what is the point of seeing it disappear ? Is it a warlike sens of victory ? [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [193.253.67.231 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (manginbenoit.pro[at]laposte.net) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 9d01e9df836df8dd3868645661e1c1f7 Subject: Re: LF: O.T.: Reflector status Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_17552_274111620.1338725623356" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:421214560:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41174fcb552908c7 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none ------=_Part_17552_274111620.1338725623356 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable That's a thing of beauty Stefan ! So what is going on ? Is it only because a few people think this reflector = is old-fashioned and want it QRT that it is bound to happen ? Is it : " I don't use, I destroy" ? If you don't want it, siply don't use i= t. But what is the point of seeing it disappear ? Is it a warlike sens of v= ictory ? What is the matter with having another reflector still active ? Is it that = somebody dislikes the perspective of not being the one and only ? What are those monopolistic fantasies ? Does'nt make sense to me. Although only qrv rx-wise for now, I really do not want to see this reflect= or fade away. de F8GRY/Ben > Message du 03/06/12 13:55 > De : "Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer"=20 > A : rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Copie =C3=A0 :=20 > Objet : Re: LF: O.T.: Reflector status > >=20 >=20 > > > [ MESSAGE.jpg (33.7 Ko) ] Une messagerie gratuite, garantie =C3=A0 vie et des services en plus, =C3= =A7a vous tente ? Je cr=C3=A9e ma bo=C3=AEte mail www.laposte.net ------=_Part_17552_274111620.1338725623356 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable That's a thing of beauty Stefan !

So what is going on ? Is it on= ly because a few people think this reflector is o= ld-fashioned and want it QRT that it is bound to happen ?
Is it : " I don't use, I destroy" ? If you don't want it, sip= ly don't use it. But what is the point of seeing it disappear ? Is it a war= like sens of victory ?

What is the matter with having another re= flector still active ? Is it that somebody dislikes the perspective of not = being the one and only ?

What are thos= e monopolistic fantasies ?

Does'nt make sense to me.

= Although only qrv rx-wise for now, I really do not want to see this re= flector fade away.
 
de F8GRY/Ben



> Message du 03/06/12 13:55
> De : "Stefan Sch&= auml;fer"
> A : rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Copie = à :
> Objet : Re: LF: O.T.: Reflector status
>
>
>
> >
> [ MESSAGE.jpg (33.7 Ko) ] ------=_Part_17552_274111620.1338725623356--