Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 1F18C38000096; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 05:29:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Sb77C-0005Di-Pm for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 10:28:50 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Sb77C-0005DZ-1T for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 10:28:50 +0100 Received: from nm12.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([77.238.189.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb77A-0000Sv-5c for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 10:28:48 +0100 Received: from [77.238.189.232] by nm12.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Jun 2012 09:28:47 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.227] by tm13.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Jun 2012 09:28:47 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1004.bt.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Jun 2012 09:28:47 -0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=btopenworld.com Result=Signature OK X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 454785.73142.bm@omp1004.bt.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 90835 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2012 09:28:47 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=xKG2kc2R2U7Iddt0pgXlMoUSCyz07nGEKqPCMZ9lJsUPwy9TVBERXGBcsrz+aQtiB2ACY0K3xy0xyN0f3Jvqd7Sb+CSmQRhZ6b6QD7YSYSdGckh1wUFmMRtrm3GoNr1ePEbzlFV5reLBqHpQ7PB2xDh0vuZnvMLgVz2Wwd0VRVA= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=s1024; t=1338715727; bh=YSIH9uZINRmbwYEpnntp+3Sk1zCd4TZc/qfIYc8394I=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=UUX0BVzSqK/mJUtGbFHt9OKD/Ez8PtyWHbfPc9aJu4fhAu/iEMvt1114Qm4XnuHWa0dAoLChEf6jQrJa1DgKaSkwE7AUaSmKoVVbTO/0r8izLEcyPU0F7kwsrRTRGtXpZS0vC4LzQBloK6kgmsafAuCdlPu5WV7tY6bfHCY8w6I= X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 9pci0qYVM1n2oX_2A19.9nRtUXWjFs4k7_kIHBG7YOBaUTP k88TEtV0jxf6w4VKrCdDJugzObMAXtmqLUCI0GnjKP7afLcw8eOTBk1ZRO8C ZhF_OeyK1nxd.xdBu6d9fc7dCDKrzvUYWmTacHJLhI9GBy71BVEVlt4g8hlF Q5eQaKAOdIlIsGVKgLenIOEi8hTNSvLEJ0BpqPTsRJ3qj24oaNXGzDhVHw3N PL7T0VcjQbWd50viG3ayf5Zyd0dyL9KwIC4E3fTx3h39V9nzKzfenGbN1P1c 8LQtgqqnv73TcbH_kVkXfSmSnnp6aYZgjXG64pPfFT6Wu0DA5CA2Oisq1rS6 joVqSfqtRqyH8_MV4MuVDHI8zjdwvlXniWnrE8HIJbh_hvtf4F1RwuJe4N16 G.qfs.JTFBft1WV.GCX9rsj5vw6r8il4u X-Yahoo-SMTP: Cxhli3eswBD1ozmtAojhjrja86kWx0Qm9tycD5QR1DKWrOLgjJcXkw-- Received: from JimPC (james.moritz@86.185.202.35 with login) by smtp817.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 03 Jun 2012 02:28:46 -0700 PDT Message-ID: <5804C62C151B4755A82A3AA96D1B3749@JimPC> From: "James Moritz" To: References: In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 10:28:57 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18463 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dear John, LF Groups --- In rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk, "John" wrote: > > Am I right in thinking that most people have transitioned to the new group > here, and that I can ask the sysop to delete the remaining addresses on > the list? [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [77.238.189.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 1f795a2ee1ecd56682b47ad11969b3d3 Subject: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: Gettign rid of Black Sheep Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:420741952:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d015.2 ; domain : btopenworld.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608c4fcb2e874dc2 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Dear John, LF Groups --- In rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk, "John" wrote: > > Am I right in thinking that most people have transitioned to the new group > here, and that I can ask the sysop to delete the remaining addresses on > the list? At the moment, there are two RSGB LF Groups, with postings that overlap but are not the same. This is a confusing situation leaving you wondering which group to send replies to, etc. So I think one or the other needs to be deleted, I guess you have to delete the one that will upset the fewest people... Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU