Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D2E5738000084; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 08:28:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Skwlr-0006AG-V5 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 13:27:27 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Skwlr-0006A7-Da for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 13:27:27 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Skwlp-0005fU-G9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 13:27:26 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q5UCRNbi005892 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 14:27:24 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q5UCRKNZ018257 for ; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 14:27:22 +0200 Message-ID: <4FEEF036.4020702@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 14:25:26 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4FEE0F7E.2090109@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <0F87F4C0AE524B1E9EA631C81D579573@gnat> <4FEE3A73.1090602@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id q5UCRNbi005892 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Jim, Thanks for your comments. Am 30.06.2012 10:14, schrieb James Moritz: > Dear Stefan, LF Group, > > The mechanical filter consists of an array of metal disks or rods > that are mechanically resonant near the centre frequency of the filter. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: ce0e5a4ae990e5a63db3ab7aea21191b Subject: Re: LF: Re: Help needed, mechanical filters Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:483840128:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408d4feef1066054 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Jim, Thanks for your comments. Am 30.06.2012 10:14, schrieb James Moritz: > Dear Stefan, LF Group, > > The mechanical filter consists of an array of metal disks or rods=20 > that are mechanically resonant near the centre frequency of the filter. So, is a microphone effect possible? > In order to convert the electrical input and output to/from =20 > mechanical vibration, there are transducers at the input and output,=20 > sometimes piezo-electric, but in this case probably magnetostrictive.=20 > These are a coil of wire wound around magnetic material which changes=20 > shape slightly depending on the magnetic flux. So electrically, the=20 > input and output of your filter are inductors - in order to get=20 > efficient transfer of signal power into the transducers and through=20 > the filter, they must be tuned to resonance, like any LC filter=20 > circuit. If they are not correctly tuned, little power from the=20 > mechanical resonators inside the filter will be coupled to the source=20 > and load, so the resonators will have very little damping, and the=20 > filter will have large peaks in the response, as you saw. Also, the=20 > insertion loss will be higher. The same type of behaviour with=20 > mis-matched loads occurs with almost any filter - LC, crystal,=20 > ceramic, cavity, etc. A similar effect occurs if one resonator is=20 > defective - in this case the mis-match occurs inside the filter. Thanks, that help to extend my understanding of such filters. > > You can probably use the input and output resonating capacitors to=20 > match your filter directly to 50R, using two capacitors in a series or=20 > shunt matching arrangement, like some have used for loop antennas. But=20 > buffer amlifiers might be needed to provide stable input and and=20 > output impedances for the filter, and provide some gain to compensate=20 > for the insertion loss. Good idea about the matching! So it is about like the input filter of=20 JA8SCD's LF converter:=20 http://icas.to/idc-136-kit/idc-136-kit-manual-eng.pdf (page 6 of 6). According to the data sheet, the insertion loss (Durchlassd=E4mpfung) is = <=20 2 dB. So if one uses a well matched 50 Ohm transmit antenna and a RX=20 with 50 Ohm input, i think no additional gain is needed. Best 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU