Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-db04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2346D380000A0; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:33:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SkinT-0003ZM-G3 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 22:32:11 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SkinS-0003ZD-TL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 22:32:10 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SkinR-0000W5-3l for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 22:32:09 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q5TLW84P018439 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:32:08 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q5TLW7hO013799 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:32:07 +0200 Message-ID: <4FEE1E65.405@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:30:13 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4FEE0F7E.2090109@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FEE172B.1050002@virgilio.it> In-Reply-To: <4FEE172B.1050002@virgilio.it> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id q5TLW84P018439 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Claudio, Mike, all, In my tests i have connected 18 kOhm to the output, but no C. I tried with a 220pF (was by hand) C but there was no change. Mike's idea with the pot is good, of course. On the output i measure with a high Z probe for the scope. But i don't know the internal impedance of the signal generator. I put the 18 kOhm in series to the signal generator but maybe i should simply play arround with it, also with the Cs. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: ac0f6ff1af52b6036ac1f4fe0c2bd52c Subject: Re: LF: Fwd: Help needed, mechanical filters Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:477058240:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40584fee1f1d0d55 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Claudio, Mike, all, In my tests i have connected 18 kOhm to the output, but no C. I tried=20 with a 220pF (was by hand) C but there was no change. Mike's idea with the pot is good, of course. On the output i measure with a high Z probe for the scope. But i don't=20 know the internal impedance of the signal generator. I put the 18 kOhm=20 in series to the signal generator but maybe i should simply play arround=20 with it, also with the Cs. On the left side stands 300 pF, on the right side 294 pF. So this is the=20 load capacity that must be applied from external components? These parts must be 50 years old or so. I find 3.95 Euro extremely cheap Thanks for the advice. The first time i work with such a filter... It=20 should be fine for other applications as well, as a IF filter... 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 29.06.2012 22:59, schrieb Claudio Girardi: > Stefan, > if I understood correctly, the datasheet says that the impedance is 18=20 > kohm if you use the red and green wires and 500 ohm if you use the=20 > yellow and green ones; so you should load both sides with 18 kohm in=20 > your case, or change taps. > Then you should also load the filter with the exact capacitance values=20 > printed on its ends, connected between the red and green wires. > > Regards, > Claudio > > On 06/29/2012 10:26 PM, Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer wrote: >> >> The input signal is connected on the left side between the red and gre= en >> wire. The output signal is taken from the right side on the red and >> green wire too. It looks as if each side has a coil on the green and r= ed >> wire, with a tap at the yellow wire. >> Helpful was this image from the web >> http://www.amateurfunkmuseum.de/AFM_321b-Dateien/image006.jpg which >> shows a similar filter. I have connected a resistor of 18 kOhm to the >> output and a 500 Ohm resistor in series to the signal generator, as >> stated in the datasheet. But the ripple does not change. >> >> Any ideas or suggestions? >> >> Guess for what i will need the filter! :-) >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >