Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6CA7A38000083; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 04:51:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Sjnwr-0000NH-Iv for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:50:05 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Sjnwr-0000N8-5u for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:50:05 +0100 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Sjnwp-0002iE-0t for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:50:04 +0100 Received: from [192.168.2.104] (p4FD176A4.dip.t-dialin.net [79.209.118.164]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap4) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M72xB-1Ryb6i3J6j-00wmnr; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:49:53 +0200 Message-ID: <4FEAC931.2060400@legal-medicine.de> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:49:53 +0200 From: pws User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111101 SUSE/3.1.16 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org CC: christoph.maurer@skmail.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de References: <4FE86518.10408@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <4FE86518.10408@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:K5HhY0U2J9oStzbxuqUHp7Hp4NwcuK3CVaL3m8PQ8pW jXmlz1NEQXk1L5PeViyCfipiTvkQDm4ZUNV0LdtmBzLkBxK4FP yCZNw6pqhAGX0sraoHKoQBqS7UmyHoMotMYJ6EiAx/7EezuQ65 GH0bSLmTTpXkQXN1jN3POY6+tsE9XT+p+S/mcX2yIr2lWb0XTP V1T/0eYI2naGEnr6JF5Zpq1TfQ/FkoRdP3XqC2zQM1cBronZ0R q6dm0lxXGBWMUMt7TcGUDI/UvNARUrpE/uRBG/EPGxxo1+lkGD ckvjnscWqd6GO+JwjuG2Ld/5/mJKYU8Tmr5+Sbk2xvIYD00IYE 23IfTCGcMV8A4ttW+U7+10kupVfqBPPyLFXONaFYr X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, You wrote: > ... Today i want to inform > you about a new VLF Grabber at the Technical University of Darmstadt, > http://skmail.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de/gvw/grabber.html run by Christoph > Maurer who is working in the nuclear science institute. Seems they want to > observe the VLF spectrum and try to make some earthquake precursors. > ... [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.227.17.8 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 7aa9ad08848e488e22e0ff1d71f4ef1d Subject: Re: LF: New VLF Grabber in Darmstadt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:340156256:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600a4feac9864f8a X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Stefan, You wrote: > ... Today i want to inform > you about a new VLF Grabber at the Technical University of Darmstadt, > http://skmail.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de/gvw/grabber.html run by Christoph > Maurer who is working in the nuclear science institute. Seems they want to > observe the VLF spectrum and try to make some earthquake precursors. > ... Missing many usual suspects at LF like MSF, 60 kHz or 81 kHz from Inskip etc. Instead 45.9 kHz, Sicily, appears at reasonable strength. May be they are running a loop with E/W-nulls? Furthermore those typical rise of noise floor from soundcards running at high sampling rates is visible. So, some 15-20 dB more gain especially above 30 kHz is recommended. Peter, Kiel http://df3lp.de