Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E54CF38000082; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 20:06:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ShrN2-00039X-26 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:05:04 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ShrN1-00039O-9a for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:05:03 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1ShrMz-0005kH-Az for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:05:02 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q5M05045026765 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 22 Jun 2012 02:05:00 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q5M0506P012041; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 02:05:00 +0200 Message-ID: <4FE3B641.2000709@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 02:03:13 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org CC: "YV7MAE Maritn A. Echazarreta D." References: <4FE39E8E.8000301@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <41D4AB78ABB34782B413399ED4F3481A@gnat> In-Reply-To: <41D4AB78ABB34782B413399ED4F3481A@gnat> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id q5M05045026765 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Alan, What do you think about the remaining signal of DCF39 after the sunset? Is it really DCF39? Or a local QRM line? I once took a recording and reprocessed it here on my PC. I saw there is a local line (without the data bursts) but it was some Hz below DCF. Since the receive system is reasonable stable (drift < 0.1 Hz) i reduced the frequency range for detecting the signal level for the DCF plot to a BW of 1 Hz. Anyway there appears a trace which is > -30 dB below the night peak but anyway visible. Realistic? That path is almost completely over water. In some days you can even see the steps of S/N reduction due to the sunrise in the reflection zones. At least it looks like that.. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 32d4aaaf019758ff5a0d8e92eec683e6 Subject: Re: LF: Re: 15 dB noise drop in 20 minutes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:365419328:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41154fe3b6e80d8a X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Alan, What do you think about the remaining signal of DCF39 after the sunset?=20 Is it really DCF39? Or a local QRM line? I once took a recording and=20 reprocessed it here on my PC. I saw there is a local line (without the=20 data bursts) but it was some Hz below DCF. Since the receive system is=20 reasonable stable (drift < 0.1 Hz) i reduced the frequency range for=20 detecting the signal level for the DCF plot to a BW of 1 Hz. Anyway=20 there appears a trace which is > -30 dB below the night peak but anyway=20 visible. Realistic? That path is almost completely over water. In some=20 days you can even see the steps of S/N reduction due to the sunrise in=20 the reflection zones. At least it looks like that.. With a receive loop in winther i think even G3KEV has a chance to appear=20 there ;-) For winther i expect at least a 10 dB S/N improvement, maybe=20 rather 20 dB. A loop which cancels the noise from the southern=20 hemisphere, many stations will have good chances to appear in SA i think. 73, Stefan Am 22.06.2012 01:46, schrieb Alan Melia: > Hi Stefan, this is a function of propagation, I think. It depends on=20 > where the interference originates. Because there is virtually no=20 > skywave propagation in the "sunrise dip", no noise is propagated by=20 > skywave (> 1000km) from the east. Where you live you have large cities=20 > all round you. We get this effect on the edge of Europe as the=20 > daylight kills the night-time propgation of noise fron the East (there=20 > a few big cities or industrial noise sources for 3000 km W of Ireland > :-)) ) > > It was thought at first that this would be the best time for DX, but=20 > despite trying it didnt work out that way. Mike G3XDV and Brian CT1DRP=20 > tried quite hard..... but eventually made the qso mid morning, when=20 > the noise was up again due to increases in daytime skywave!! That is=20 > if I remember correctly.....it fascinated me as I was just getting=20 > interested in LF long distance propagation around then. We found=20 > evening effects in Nova Scotia and I believe similar effects were=20 > reported by John W1TAG and Jay W1VD who are very close to the US East=20 > Coast. > > Alan > G3NYK > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Sch=E4fer"=20 > > To: ; "YV7MAE Maritn A. Echazarreta D."=20 > > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 11:22 PM > Subject: LF: 15 dB noise drop in 20 minutes > > >> Hello Martin, LF, >> >> I'm fascinated by the noise drop on LF which occurs during your=20 >> sunrise. On your grabber=20 >> (http://dl.dropbox.com/u/74746618/LF/YV7MAE_LF_Grabber.html ), i can=20 >> see the noise drops 15 dB within 20 minutes. That means the sun must=20 >> be very strong so the ionosphere is very quickly ionized. Also the=20 >> local lightning density must be extreme. All in all it looks like a=20 >> very sensitive system. But some directivity would be interesting :-) >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >> PS: I will be on 136.172 kHz again this night, starting in a few=20 >> minutes... >> >