Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 148E1380000A0; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 18:47:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Sh7Bv-000777-Pu for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 23:46:31 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Sh7Bv-00076y-9N for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 23:46:31 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Sh7Bt-0006yV-E8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 23:46:30 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q5JMkSKo005879 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:46:29 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q5JMkS9X029761 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:46:28 +0200 Message-ID: <4FE100DB.60809@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:44:43 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4FE0ED02.4080903@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>,<4FE0EF87.8060905@kpnmail.nl> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FAB195C@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> In-Reply-To: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FAB195C@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id q5JMkSKo005879 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Rik, MF, Right now i'm testing the TX antenna as a RX antenna. This works much better than expected. A 10 dB attenuator is needed but no problem. Maybe you can give me a test signal again on 502 kHz, or someone else? [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 4b5b5ebe37a4c4f430f59bc35c1947b0 Subject: LF: Test signal needed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:462435936:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4ad24fe1017d67d1 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Rik, MF, Right now i'm testing the TX antenna as a RX antenna. This works much=20 better than expected. A 10 dB attenuator is needed but no problem. Maybe=20 you can give me a test signal again on 502 kHz, or someone else? It looks like the QRN is much lower on that antenna. That means that=20 many of the crashes during my CQ calls have been charged rain drops that=20 were falling on the E field probe, just my guess. I will listen another 20 min. on 502 kHz and apprechiate any test=20 signals from amateurs. 73, Stefan Am 19.06.2012 23:53, schrieb Rik Strobbe: > actually 501.2kHz. > Stefan, I have replied to your CQ several times, but no luck. > You are 579 with the usual QSB. > I am running 150W into a 11m high / 25m long lazy-L antenna, estimared = ERP abt 1W. > > 73, Rik ON7YD > > ________________________________________ > Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep= .org] namens pa3abk [pa3abk@kpnmail.nl] > Verzonden: dinsdag 19 juni 2012 23:30 > Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Onderwerp: Re: LF: CQ on 476.5 kHz CW > > Lsn fer OR7T on 502 pse > Jan/pa3abk > > On 19-6-2012 23:20, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: > =20 >> just in case someone wants... >> I will call until 22 UT if no one replies... >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >> >> =20 > > -- > pa3abk<-> dordrecht jo21it > =20