Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id CDB9D380000C3; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 10:06:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SgG6m-00061n-Q5 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 15:05:40 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SgG6m-00061e-8J for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 15:05:40 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SgG6k-000715-Ih for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 15:05:39 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q5HE5aC6008305 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:05:36 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q5HE5a7I003152 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:05:36 +0200 Message-ID: <4FDDE3C9.8080505@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:03:53 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: MF, I just thought my receiver isn't working correctly. I thought the xtal does not start to oscillate due to the higher ambient temperatures in the afternoon. But later i found that the band noise on MF is significantly lower than in the evening, at least 20 dB. So now i see that the band noise is about 5 dB above my soundcard noise with the current setup. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 59677119386dcf9f1872cb454dc1331d Subject: LF: Further MF impressions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:432316320:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600a4fdde46c6bd9 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none MF, I just thought my receiver isn't working correctly. I thought the xtal does not start to oscillate due to the higher ambient temperatures in the afternoon. But later i found that the band noise on MF is significantly lower than in the evening, at least 20 dB. So now i see that the band noise is about 5 dB above my soundcard noise with the current setup. What do others know about the ground wave range in summer and in the afternoon? When does the band open? Similar to LF? BTW thanks to DF6NM for the grabber. Nice tool to get some experience in these first days... 73, Stefan/DK7FC