Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B645C38000083; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:54:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SgEz9-0005lG-63 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 13:53:43 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SgEz8-0005l7-Pv for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 13:53:42 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SgEz6-0006nz-Qs for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 13:53:41 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q5HCrd0w028138 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 14:53:40 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q5HCrdhM000984 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 14:53:39 +0200 Message-ID: <4FDDD2ED.4030701@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 14:51:57 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1339856589.169975917@f7.mail.ru>, <4FDD2024.2080507@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FDDDF12.7289.582D18E@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> In-Reply-To: <4FDDDF12.7289.582D18E@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id q5HCrd0w028138 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Mike, Yes, sure. And 73 kHz is very easy compared to 8.97 kHz and 8.97 kHz is very easy compared to 5.17 kHz :-)) 73, Stefan [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: e90dcb17768c7e768f13e0721cc1c0c7 Subject: Re: LF: rn3aus grabber online Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:427100000:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60194fddd3880186 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Mike, Yes, sure. And 73 kHz is very easy compared to 8.97 kHz and 8.97 kHz is=20 very easy compared to 5.17 kHz :-)) 73, Stefan Am 17.06.2012 14:43, schrieb Mike Dennison: > On 17 Jun 2012 at 2:09, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: > > =20 >> Ah, BTW, see that tiny little MF coil beside the LF coil!! LF is stil >> the real hard stuff! :-) >> =20 > Yes, that's what we used to say when 136kHz came along. Easy compared > to the 12mH coils we used on 73kHz! > > Mike, G3XDV > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > > =20