Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 259ED3800009D; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 19:36:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Sg2XL-0002jo-M7 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:36:11 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Sg2XL-0002je-7E for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:36:11 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Sg2XJ-0004YK-1S for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:36:10 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q5GNa8lW028150 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 01:36:08 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q5GNa84D003777 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 01:36:08 +0200 Message-ID: <4FDD1802.1050203@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 01:34:26 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <001d01cd4c11$9533fe20$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> In-Reply-To: <001d01cd4c11$9533fe20$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Mal, Tnx for QSO. There was solid copy from the first moment. I just didn't know that you are calling on 501... Am 17.06.2012 00:44, schrieb mal hamilton: > Stefan > At last a QSO hi. > Tnx for the QSO a few minutes ago and the 579 report. I cfm u were 569 > solid copy with heavy QRN on the band. Yes, massive QRN. But i like QRN as long as the signals are still perfect copy! That makes a exciting feeling of amateur radio, all missed in QRSS... [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 1908b49407fc556987226b536cc4bad0 Subject: Re: LF: qso dk7fc Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080908030501000702040507" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:441351008:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41184fdd18922e17 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080908030501000702040507 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mal, Tnx for QSO. There was solid copy from the first moment. I just didn't know that you are calling on 501... Am 17.06.2012 00:44, schrieb mal hamilton: > Stefan > At last a QSO hi. > Tnx for the QSO a few minutes ago and the 579 report. I cfm u were 569 > solid copy with heavy QRN on the band. Yes, massive QRN. But i like QRN as long as the signals are still perfect copy! That makes a exciting feeling of amateur radio, all missed in QRSS... BTW: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/G3KEV.WAV (10MB, the mp3 converter does not work soemhow) Just have it in mind when you talk about my ears... Ah and BTW the reception was done by using a micro antenna, an active E field antenna that was hold out of the window, just 1 meter. The probe is a short variable length antenna from a UKW radio (allows experimenting with different probe length..) > At the end you peaked up to 579 good signal. Glad to be your first CW > QSO on MF ...the first UK stn. The first ever was PA3ABK. > 73 es gl de mal/g3kev 73, QRQ, Stefan/DK7FC --------------080908030501000702040507 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mal,

Tnx for QSO. There was solid copy from the first moment. I just didn't know that you are calling on 501...

Am 17.06.2012 00:44, schrieb mal hamilton:
Stefan
At last a QSO hi.
Tnx for the QSO a few minutes ago and the 579 report. I cfm u were 569 solid copy with heavy QRN on the band.
Yes, massive QRN. But i like QRN as long as the signals are still perfect copy! That makes a exciting feeling of amateur radio, all missed in QRSS...

BTW:  https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/G3KEV.WAV  (10MB, the mp3 converter does not work soemhow) Just have it in mind when you talk about my ears... Ah and BTW the reception was done by using a micro antenna, an active E field antenna that was hold out of the window, just 1 meter. The probe is a short variable length antenna from a UKW radio (allows experimenting with different probe length..)


At the end you peaked up to 579 good signal. Glad to be your first CW QSO on MF
...the first UK stn. The first ever was PA3ABK.

73 es gl de mal/g3kev
 

73, QRQ, Stefan/DK7FC
--------------080908030501000702040507--