Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E80AE38000099; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:08:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Sg19h-0001nO-MH for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 23:07:41 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Sg19g-0001nF-S7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 23:07:40 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Sg19e-0004Ac-IB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 23:07:39 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q5GM7bCg029135 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:07:37 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q5GM7bRh001231 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:07:37 +0200 Message-ID: <4FDD0343.3070901@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:05:55 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4FDCE611.7070004@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FDCEF47.9050805@kpnmail.nl> <4FDCF349.5060100@kpnmail.nl> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thank you Jan for the QSO, Chris and all the others for the many reports my email. Yes, it was a historic moment for me! The first amateur radio station i ever heared on MF (except 160m of course). The QSO was like on HF, without any problems! I can well imagine that this is a CW band where real time QSOs can take place. And this night is in summer and with high QRN, so winther must be wonderful. No contest stress like on HF and still a special place below 1 MHz :-) 137 kHz is the real challenge of course but its very nice to have a real QSO band now! [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: f9f85a03ab18710b130c40acc03380f0 Subject: Re: LF: CW on 477.5 kHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090008080308050006020403" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:435596544:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608a4fdd03e837c3 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090008080308050006020403 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id q5GM7bCg029135 Thank you Jan for the QSO, Chris and all the others for the many reports=20 my email. Yes, it was a historic moment for me! The first amateur radio station i=20 ever heared on MF (except 160m of course). The QSO was like on HF,=20 without any problems! I can well imagine that this is a CW band where=20 real time QSOs can take place. And this night is in summer and with high=20 QRN, so winther must be wonderful. No contest stress like on HF and still a special place below 1 MHz :-)=20 137 kHz is the real challenge of course but its very nice to have a real=20 QSO band now! I will go on to improve some things here and will see how the active=20 ferrite antenna performs on MF, maybe cancelling out the QRN... The QSB was interesting and it clearly shows up that the ground range=20 distance is much lower. I got audible copy from the UK but nothing at=20 DJ2LF in 175km distance... Will continue to listen and prepare my remote link to key the PA here=20 while sitting in the forest and receiving there :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 16.06.2012 23:24, schrieb Chris 4X1RF: > Jan, Stefan > > Congratulations for your 477.5 / 502 KHz QSO! It was fun to hear it in=20 > real time on the Delfi WebSdr. > > > 73s > Chris 4X1RF > > > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 11:57 PM, pa3abk > wrote: > > Stefan, > > At the mom I'll will call you on 502kHz everytime you stop your CQ. > And stop when your CQ starts again. > > There's some QSB on it but have peaks in the region of 4-5. > > > Jan/pa3abk > > > On 16-6-2012 22:40, pa3abk wrote: > > Stefan, > > Can you indicate were you listen in your CQ call? > > At te mom you are becoming better. > > > > Jan/pa3abk > > On 16-6-2012 22:01, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: > > MF, > > Now my RX and active antenna is much better after adding a > band filter in front of the first gate. Most probably > there was an overload of the input before. Now DLF is 40 > dB attenuated and the RX performs much better. I can hear > the crashes / sferics and see several traces, still not > sure if they are local QRM or a far field signal. > > My TX is ready as well. I will *call CQ on 477.5 > kHz in CW and look for skeds*! I can receive > on 505 kHz (arround) as well but my filters in the RX > already attenuate the region by about 20 dB... Anyway > worth a try. > > Starting now! > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > > > > > --=20 > pa3abk<-> dordrecht jo21it > > > --------------090008080308050006020403 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thank you Jan for the QSO, Chris and all the others for the many reports my email.

Yes, it was a historic moment for me! The first amateur radio station i ever heared on MF (except 160m of course). The QSO was like on HF, without any problems! I can well imagine that this is a CW band where real time QSOs can take place. And this night is in summer and with high QRN, so winther must be wonderful.
No contest stress like on HF and still a special place below 1 MHz :-) 137 kHz is the real challenge of course but its very nice to have a real QSO band now!

I will go on to improve some things here and will see how the active ferrite antenna performs on MF, maybe cancelling out the QRN...

The QSB was interesting and it clearly shows up that the ground range distance is much lower. I got audible copy from the UK but nothing at DJ2LF in 175km distance...
Will continue to listen and prepare my remote link to key the PA here while sitting in the forest and receiving there :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 16.06.2012 23:24, schrieb Chris 4X1RF:
Jan, Stefan

Congratulations for your 477.5 / 502 KHz QSO! It was fun to hear it in real time on the Delfi WebSdr.


73s
Chris 4X1RF


On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 11:57 PM, pa3abk <pa3abk@kpnmail.nl> wrote:
Stefan,

At the mom I'll will call you on 502kHz everytime you stop your CQ.
And stop when your CQ starts again.

There's some QSB on it but have peaks in the region of 4-5.


Jan/pa3abk


On 16-6-2012 22:40, pa3abk wrote:
Stefan,

Can you indicate were you listen in your CQ call?

At te mom you are becoming better.



Jan/pa3abk

On 16-6-2012 22:01, Stefan Schäfer wrote:
MF,

Now my RX and active antenna is much better after adding a band filter in front of the first gate. Most probably there was an overload of the input before. Now DLF is 40 dB attenuated and the RX performs much better. I can hear the crashes / sferics and see several traces, still not sure if they are local QRM or a far field signal.

My TX is ready as well. I will *call CQ on 477.5 kHz in CW and look for skeds*! I can receive on 505 kHz (arround) as well but my filters in the RX already attenuate the region by about 20 dB... Anyway worth a try.

Starting now!

73, Stefan/DK7FC




--
pa3abk<->  dordrecht jo21it



--------------090008080308050006020403--