Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2E76E380000C0; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:47:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Sfzt3-00013p-BU for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:46:25 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Sfzt2-00013g-Tx for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:46:24 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Sfzt1-0003qI-0w for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:46:23 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q5GKkLt9003774 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 22:46:22 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q5GKkMdM031502 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 22:46:22 +0200 Message-ID: <4FDCF038.3080102@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 22:44:40 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4FDCE611.7070004@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FDCEB38.9090807@kpnmail.nl> In-Reply-To: <4FDCEB38.9090807@kpnmail.nl> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id q5GKkLt9003774 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Jan, Thanks for the info. Are you ready for a QSO? We can try. When i disconnect the antenna, the noise drops by more than 40 dB, so maybe it works on 501 as well. I still haven't heared a amateur radio station on MF in my live! So that would be a very premair. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 5f132ffce194fb93f2267a462d849f2b Subject: Re: LF: CW on 477.5 kHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:467747040:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60c94fdcf0cc1018 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Jan, Thanks for the info. Are you ready for a QSO? We can try. When i=20 disconnect the antenna, the noise drops by more than 40 dB, so maybe it=20 works on 501 as well. I still haven't heared a amateur radio station on MF in my live! So that=20 would be a very premair. If you are ready, tell me aQRG... 73, Stefan Am 16.06.2012 22:23, schrieb pa3abk: > Stefan, > > I can hear you, marginal... > In QSO some other DL station (?) > > But maybe it's better to listen on 501kHz, possible the filter is=20 > less attenuated there. > Have my doubts, because you are very deep in the noise (and static) > > FYI I have H24 solid CW QSO with g3xiz mostly S-7/8 about same=20 > distance both using about 100W. > > Jan/pa3abk > > > NNNN > On 16-6-2012 22:01, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: >> MF, >> >> Now my RX and active antenna is much better after adding a band=20 >> filter in front of the first gate. Most probably there was an=20 >> overload of the input before. Now DLF is 40 dB attenuated and the RX=20 >> performs much better. I can hear the crashes / sferics and see=20 >> several traces, still not sure if they are local QRM or a far field=20 >> signal. >> >> My TX is ready as well. I will *call CQ on 477.5 kHz in CW and look=20 >> for skeds*! I can receive on 505 kHz (arround) as well but my filters=20 >> in the RX already attenuate the region by about 20 dB... Anyway worth=20 >> a try. >> >> Starting now! >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC > >