Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-md03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 7A7C0380000AF; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:04:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SfzD7-0000T9-SD for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:03:05 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SfzD7-0000T0-EY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:03:05 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SfzD5-0003c9-Td for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:03:04 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q5GK326H016177 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 22:03:02 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q5GK32Ai030526 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 22:03:02 +0200 Message-ID: <4FDCE611.7070004@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 22:01:21 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: MF, Now my RX and active antenna is much better after adding a band filter in front of the first gate. Most probably there was an overload of the input before. Now DLF is 40 dB attenuated and the RX performs much better. I can hear the crashes / sferics and see several traces, still not sure if they are local QRM or a far field signal. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 1c38f63d01970a2bf149f660c9cb2a37 Subject: LF: CW on 477.5 kHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060301020700080604010302" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:411708384:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60574fdce6b76959 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060301020700080604010302 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MF, Now my RX and active antenna is much better after adding a band filter in front of the first gate. Most probably there was an overload of the input before. Now DLF is 40 dB attenuated and the RX performs much better. I can hear the crashes / sferics and see several traces, still not sure if they are local QRM or a far field signal. My TX is ready as well. I will *call CQ on 477.5 kHz in CW and look for skeds*! I can receive on 505 kHz (arround) as well but my filters in the RX already attenuate the region by about 20 dB... Anyway worth a try. Starting now! 73, Stefan/DK7FC --------------060301020700080604010302 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MF,

Now my RX and active antenna is much better after adding a band filter in front of the first gate. Most probably there was an overload of the input before. Now DLF is 40 dB attenuated and the RX performs much better. I can hear the crashes / sferics and see several traces, still not sure if they are local QRM or a far field signal.

My TX is ready as well. I will call CQ on 477.5 kHz in CW and look for skeds! I can receive on 505 kHz (arround) as well but my filters in the RX already attenuate the region by about 20 dB... Anyway worth a try.

Starting now!

73, Stefan/DK7FC
--------------060301020700080604010302--