Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id EABC838000099; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:16:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Seuv1-0004yC-Gz for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:15:59 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Seuv1-0004y3-3L for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:15:59 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Seuuz-00069i-3r for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:15:57 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q5DLFsPs004213 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:15:54 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q5DLFsCX004709 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:15:54 +0200 Message-ID: <4FD902A7.8000609@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:14:15 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <16BC8B3CA8672445BC2A29B4C14A26D4379ED2AAB4@exlnmb01.eur.nsroot.net> <4DF9EFD1.5010208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1313780109.51443.YahooMailNeo@web111907.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <9CD1E11E8BC9402CB4AECECAC4088443@JimPC> <1314394178.5030.YahooMailNeo@web111905.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <1314641183.5605.YahooMailNeo@web111910.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4E5CBC9A.5020900@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1314705226.37125.YahooMailNeo@web111901.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4E5CF192.3040905@legal-medicine.de> <1317076720.22768.YahooMailNeo@web29509.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <1317077173.13177.YahooMailNeo@web29509.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <1317119515.35504.YahooMailNeo@web29502.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <97A4CD4629F94A90A7F5AFD6E2A17E73@JimPC> <1317287203.84598.YahooMailNeo@web29516.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <1339618104.65016.YahooMailNeo@web29503.mail.ird.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1339618104.65016.YahooMailNeo@web29503.mail.ird.yahoo.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Daniele, I didn't study all the details that graph is offering but from the recent reports of my beacon signal from YO/4X1RF and RN3AGC i can confirm that there are nights in June that are at least as good as nights in December! At least in that range, < 3000 km. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: fb3e28a759dea7e01d34d3fe7de7ae98 Subject: Re: LF: Best annual period for listening to LF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040706070908060109000301" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:448543712:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404b4fd903436c9b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040706070908060109000301 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Daniele, I didn't study all the details that graph is offering but from the recent reports of my beacon signal from YO/4X1RF and RN3AGC i can confirm that there are nights in June that are at least as good as nights in December! At least in that range, < 3000 km. 73, Stefan Am 13.06.2012 22:08, schrieb Daniele Tincani: > Hello LF, > looking at this very interesting graph: > http://df3lp.de/misc/hga22/ > my understanding is that summer nights - though shorter than winter > ones - could be better for reception of LF signals in terms of signal > strenght. Is this conclusion correct? > Thanks > 73 > D. --------------040706070908060109000301 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Daniele,

I didn't study all the details that graph is offering but from the recent reports of my beacon signal from YO/4X1RF and RN3AGC i can confirm that there are nights in June that are at least as good as nights in December! At least in that range, < 3000 km.

73, Stefan



Am 13.06.2012 22:08, schrieb Daniele Tincani:
 
Hello LF,
 
looking at this very interesting graph:
 
 
my understanding is that summer nights - though shorter than winter ones - could be better for reception of LF signals in terms of signal strenght. Is this conclusion correct?
 
Thanks
73
D.
 
--------------040706070908060109000301--