Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 40CE33800008D; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 16:23:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ScjDr-0004yB-7x for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:22:23 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ScjDq-0004y0-QH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:22:22 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1ScjDo-0004B7-T5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:22:21 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q57KMJkG021573 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 22:22:19 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q57KMJcU012867 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 22:22:19 +0200 Message-ID: <4FD10D1E.7030304@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 22:20:46 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4FD0B65C.6030204@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0C693974@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> In-Reply-To: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0C693974@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id q57KMJkG021573 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thank you Rik! How much stronger was HE3OM? :-) Let's try in winther again when the leaves are down and the soil is frozen and i fire on all cylinders (as the US guys would say :-) ). 73, Stefan Am 07.06.2012 19:26, schrieb Rik Strobbe: > Hi Stefan, > > 579 on my 500kHz antenna (11m high, 25m long lazy-L tuned at 500kHz) and weak but clear copy on a 2m indoor wire. > The only signal that was stronger here was HE3OM. > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T > > > Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens Stefan Schäfer [Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de] > Verzonden: donderdag 7 juni 2012 16:10 > Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Onderwerp: LF: CW beacon on 137.0 kHz > > LF! > > I'm running a CW beacon at 137.0 kHz for some time. The QRN is high with > thunderstorms in north east France, coming closer to DL. Maybe a > challenge for your RX is difficult conds. Anyway, we should bear uo > against the QRN :-) > In the past activities there was a good feedback in the DX cluster at > http://www.dxsummit.fi/CustomFilter.aspx?customCount=50&customRange=137 > so this is worth to try to gain some newcomers to the LF band! > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 739d4fb39bd02fc5a2de5437a39bb056 Subject: Re: LF: RE: CW beacon on 137.0 kHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:454797856:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4ad44fd10da93216 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Thank you Rik! How much stronger was HE3OM? :-) Let's try in winther again when the=20 leaves are down and the soil is frozen and i fire on all cylinders (as=20 the US guys would say :-) ). 73, Stefan Am 07.06.2012 19:26, schrieb Rik Strobbe: > Hi Stefan, > > 579 on my 500kHz antenna (11m high, 25m long lazy-L tuned at 500kHz) an= d weak but clear copy on a 2m indoor wire. > The only signal that was stronger here was HE3OM. > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T > > ________________________________________ > Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep= .org] namens Stefan Sch=E4fer [Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de] > Verzonden: donderdag 7 juni 2012 16:10 > Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Onderwerp: LF: CW beacon on 137.0 kHz > > LF! > > I'm running a CW beacon at 137.0 kHz for some time. The QRN is high wit= h > thunderstorms in north east France, coming closer to DL. Maybe a > challenge for your RX is difficult conds. Anyway, we should bear uo > against the QRN :-) > In the past activities there was a good feedback in the DX cluster at > http://www.dxsummit.fi/CustomFilter.aspx?customCount=3D50&customRange=3D= 137 > so this is worth to try to gain some newcomers to the LF band! > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > =20