Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id F2B003800009F; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 13:00:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Sbade-0005tI-EP for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:00:18 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Sbadd-0005t6-LM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:00:17 +0100 Received: from cmsout01.mbox.net ([165.212.64.31]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Sbadb-0007kS-Ii for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:00:16 +0100 Received: from cmsout01.mbox.net (cmsout01-lo [127.0.0.1]) by cmsout01.mbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD022ACDBC; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 17:00:12 +0000 (GMT) X-USANET-Received: from cmsout01.mbox.net [127.0.0.1] by cmsout01.mbox.net via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.82F) with ESMTP id 197qFDRaJ7520M01; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 17:00:09 -0000 X-USANET-Routed: 3 gwsout-vs Q:bmvirus Received: from imap01.cms.usa.net [165.212.11.1] by cmsout01.mbox.net via smtad (C8.MAIN.3.72B) with ESMTP id XID230qFDRaJ1326X01; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 17:00:09 -0000 X-USANET-Source: 165.212.11.1 IN dibene@usa.net imap01.cms.usa.net X-USANET-MsgId: XID230qFDRaJ1326X01 Received: from [127.0.0.1] [151.55.21.126] by imap01.cms.usa.net (ESMTPSA/dibene@usa.net) via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.82G) with ESMTPSA id 269qFDRaJ0032M21; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 17:00:09 -0000 X-USANET-Auth: 151.55.21.126 AUTH dibene@usa.net [127.0.0.1] Message-ID: <4FCCE996.2070606@usa.net> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:00:06 +0200 From: Alberto di Bene User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk, LF Mailing List References: <4FCB96A9.4010009@usa.net> <4FCB9F34.7040604@legal-medicine.de> <4FCBCC8B.9050308@usa.net> <77A08BCA-E9AB-404B-B425-BFD3564F66FE@thelortons.co.uk> <4FCCC63E.6040400@hifidelity.com> In-Reply-To: <4FCCC63E.6040400@hifidelity.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120604-0, 06/04/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Z-USANET-MsgId: XID269qFDRaJ0032X21 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 6/4/2012 4:29 PM, Steve Dove wrote: > Here and now, a 'QSO' group and a 'Technical' group seem like > a really good idea, but nobody, I mean nobody, has that kind > of discipline - eventually a dilute mish-mash will appear on > both. Later attempts to shepherd(!) contributors into the > appropriate groups will be met with ill-will, factions will > arise etc. Seen just this happen. And who will enforce the separation of the topics between the two groups ? I can stand an occasional post about rag-chewing CW QSOs on the Yahoo group, after all the Delete key is so handy, but it would be a pity if an interesting technical subject were discussed only on the Blacksheep reflector, which I will shortly unsubscribe. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [165.212.64.31 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 7ab87d4d3ea1d9dcb73a78e83fe4d608 Subject: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070303050001060800010800" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:439473120:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db4084fcce9ca657f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070303050001060800010800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 6/4/2012 4:29 PM, Steve Dove wrote: > Here and now, a 'QSO' group and a 'Technical' group seem like > a really good idea, but nobody, I mean nobody, has that kind > of discipline - eventually a dilute mish-mash will appear on > both. Later attempts to shepherd(!) contributors into the > appropriate groups will be met with ill-will, factions will > arise etc. Seen just this happen. And who will enforce the separation of the topics between the two groups ? I can stand an occasional post about rag-chewing CW QSOs on the Yahoo group, after all the Delete key is so handy, but it would be a pity if an interesting technical subject were discussed only on the Blacksheep reflector, which I will shortly unsubscribe. 73 Alberto I2PHD --------------070303050001060800010800 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 6/4/2012 4:29 PM, Steve Dove wrote:
Here and now, a 'QSO' group and a 'Technical' group =
seem like=20
a really good idea, but nobody, I mean nobody, has that kind=20
of discipline - eventually a dilute mish-mash will appear on=20
both.  Later attempts to shepherd(!) contributors into the=20
appropriate groups will be met with ill-will, factions will=20
arise etc.  Seen just this happen.
And who will enforce the separation of the topics between the two groups ?
I can stand an occasional post about rag-chewing CW QSOs on the Yahoo group,
after all the Delete key is so handy, but it would be a pity if an interesting technical
subject were discussed only on the Blacksheep reflector, which I will shortly unsubscribe.

73=A0 Alberto=A0 I2PHD

--------------070303050001060800010800--