Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 4781738000125; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 11:25:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SbZ8Y-0004qT-OB for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 16:24:06 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SbZ8X-0004qK-Uy for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 16:24:05 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SbZ8W-0007Mx-1y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 16:24:04 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q54FO30S005056 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 17:24:03 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q54FO383029622 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 17:24:03 +0200 Message-ID: <4FCCD2B9.1030408@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 17:22:33 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4FCB96A9.4010009@usa.net> <4FCB9F34.7040604@legal-medicine.de> <4FCBCC8B.9050308@usa.net> <77A08BCA-E9AB-404B-B425-BFD3564F66FE@thelortons.co.uk> <517B3527-8D27-4E07-853D-653F9AF3E025@thelortons.co.uk> <4FCCCB31.4080201@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello John, Yesterday i subscribed again, just for voting. I got the confirmation to be on the list (only the email list!) and also got new messages from the yahoo list. But the poll area was still blanked and appeared in the "members only" section. So no chance. I unsubscribed again... [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 29f208b223fe7a2cb359508e38e2ea2d Subject: Re: LF: Re: Black Sheep Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090807030305090100090402" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TITLE_EMPTY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:486815744:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40c94fccd35159ed X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090807030305090100090402 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id q54FO30S005056 Hello John, Yesterday i subscribed again, just for voting. I got the confirmation to=20 be on the list (only the email list!) and also got new messages from the=20 yahoo list. But the poll area was still blanked and appeared in the=20 "members only" section. So no chance. I unsubscribed again... Apart from this, there are several members (i assume) who are not so=20 fimilar with the english language but anyway want to be a part of the LF=20 group. Some of them are 70+ years old i assume. This may be to complex=20 for a fraction of those and so they have no real chance to vote. So=20 their opinion will be ignored! Anyway, you clearly see from the emails here that it's by far not only=20 me who wants to stay here. The LF community here is a small group,=20 although we are spread all over the world. If the pro-blacksheep party=20 (in a fair poll) would be only 20%, would you shut them down? 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 04.06.2012 17:03, schrieb John Gould: > Stefan, > > I not sure that you are correct in saying that one needs a yahoo=20 > account. I've subscribed to Yahoo! Groups with my Gmail account and=20 > that worked OK, so you should be able to join the RSGB_LF_Group with=20 > your Heidelberg e-mail account, wait for the membership to be=20 > authorised by one of the moderators, vote and then un-subscribe. > > I've not run a poll on this list - it was so easy to set up a poll on=20 > the other group that everyone can see who voted and how they voted. > > 73 John, G3WKL > > On 4 June 2012 15:50, Stefan Sch=E4fer=20 > > wrote: > > Hi Clive, LF, > > For those who simply subscribed to the list but without having a > yahoo account it is not possible to vote! This situation is > advantaging the pro-yahoo party. Please remind those who are blind > for such facts that there are further members (outside the poll) > who want to codeterminate in this process. > > My vote is pro blacksheep and i would agree with the 2 group > compromise. As long as the two groups are not treated like > competitors, where one has to win and the other will be shut down > after some time. > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > Am 04.06.2012 13:15, schrieb Clive Lorton: > > If you have voted it is possible to change your vote before > the voting period ends. > > > --------------090807030305090100090402 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello John,

Yesterday i subscribed again, just for voting. I got the confirmation to be on the list (only the email list!) and also got new messages from the yahoo list. But the poll area was still blanked and appeared in the "members only" section. So no chance. I unsubscribed again...

Apart from this, there are several members (i assume) who are not so fimilar with the english language but anyway want to be a part of the LF group. Some of them are 70+ years old i assume. This may be to complex for a fraction of those and so they have no real chance to vote. So their opinion will be ignored!

Anyway, you clearly see from the emails here that it's by far not only me who wants to stay here. The LF community here is a small group, although we are spread all over the world. If the pro-blacksheep party (in a fair poll) would be only 20%, would you shut them down?

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 04.06.2012 17:03, schrieb John Gould:
Stefan,

I not sure that you are correct in saying that one needs a yahoo account.  I've subscribed to Yahoo! Groups with my Gmail account and that worked OK, so you should be able to join the RSGB_LF_Group with your Heidelberg e-mail account, wait for the membership to be authorised by one of the moderators, vote and then un-subscribe.  

I've not run a poll on this list - it was so easy to set up a poll on the other group that everyone can see who voted and how they voted.  

73 John, G3WKL

On 4 June 2012 15:50, Stefan Schäfer <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote:
Hi Clive, LF,

For those who simply subscribed to the list but without having a yahoo account it is not possible to vote! This situation is advantaging the pro-yahoo party. Please remind those who are blind for such facts that there are further members (outside the poll) who want to codeterminate in this process.

My vote is pro blacksheep and i would agree with the 2 group compromise. As long as the two groups are not treated like competitors, where one has to win and the other will be shut down after some time.

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 04.06.2012 13:15, schrieb Clive Lorton:
If you have voted it is possible to change your vote before the voting period ends.
 


--------------090807030305090100090402--