Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-db01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id AB45038000085; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 16:45:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SbHei-0005qz-CW for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 21:44:08 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SbHeh-0005qq-N4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 21:44:07 +0100 Received: from cmsout02.mbox.net ([165.212.64.32]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SbHef-0003dz-LF for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 21:44:06 +0100 Received: from cmsout02.mbox.net (co02-lo [127.0.0.1]) by cmsout02.mbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6ACF134321; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 20:44:02 +0000 (GMT) X-USANET-Received: from cmsout02.mbox.net [127.0.0.1] by cmsout02.mbox.net via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.82F) with ESMTP id 151qFcur80464M02; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 20:43:59 -0000 X-USANET-Routed: 3 gwsout-vs Q:bmvirus Received: from imap03.cms.usa.net [165.212.11.3] by cmsout02.mbox.net via smtad (C8.MAIN.3.72B) with ESMTP id XID164qFcur85891X02; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 20:43:59 -0000 X-USANET-Source: 165.212.11.3 IN dibene@usa.net imap03.cms.usa.net X-USANET-MsgId: XID164qFcur85891X02 Received: from [127.0.0.1] [151.55.22.185] by imap03.cms.usa.net (ESMTPSA/dibene@usa.net) via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.82G) with ESMTPSA id 772qFcur79616M23; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 20:43:58 -0000 X-USANET-Auth: 151.55.22.185 AUTH dibene@usa.net [127.0.0.1] Message-ID: <4FCBCC8B.9050308@usa.net> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 22:43:55 +0200 From: Alberto di Bene User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk References: <4FCB96A9.4010009@usa.net> <4FCB9F34.7040604@legal-medicine.de> In-Reply-To: <4FCB9F34.7040604@legal-medicine.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120603-1, 06/03/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Z-USANET-MsgId: XID772qFcur79616X23 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 6/3/2012 7:30 PM, pws wrote: > I'm running Beagle on Gnome for indexing and search for any kind of > information stored locally. > > Postings, images and other "information" which are "Googleable" > or "Yapooable" will be more a problem than a feature in the > future. > > There's only one advantage using those modern, advertisement > driven open systems. You always have to keep in mind: > "don't post when coming from pub." > > So, please tell me what is "outdated" here? What is outdated is the fact that to use your technique of finding relevant contents, one would be forced to store everything locally.... then of course any decent tool like Google Desktop can index and find what one is interested in. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [165.212.64.32 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: fb3e28a759dea7e01d34d3fe7de7ae98 Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080100040300000201040902" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:427380544:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40554fcbccd00dba X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080100040300000201040902 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 6/3/2012 7:30 PM, pws wrote: > I'm running Beagle on Gnome for indexing and search for any kind of > information stored locally. > > Postings, images and other "information" which are "Googleable" > or "Yapooable" will be more a problem than a feature in the > future. > > There's only one advantage using those modern, advertisement > driven open systems. You always have to keep in mind: > "don't post when coming from pub." > > So, please tell me what is "outdated" here? What is outdated is the fact that to use your technique of finding relevant contents, one would be forced to store everything locally.... then of course any decent tool like Google Desktop can index and find what one is interested in. IMHO, it is much more intelligent and rationale to have a central repository, where everything is archived, instead of duplicating on each user PC all the past messages of the group. 73 Alberto I2PHD --------------080100040300000201040902 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 6/3/2012 7:30 PM, pws wrote:
I'm running Beagle on Gnome for indexing and search =
for any kind of
information stored locally.

Postings, images and other "information" which are "Googleable"
or "Yapooable" will be more a problem than a feature in the
future.

There's only one advantage using those modern, advertisement
driven open systems. You always have to keep in mind:
"don't post when coming from pub."

So, please tell me what is "outdated" here?
What is outdated is the fact that to use your technique of finding relevant contents,
one would be forced to store everything locally.... then of course any decent tool
like Google Desktop can index and find what one is interested in.
IMHO, it is much more intelligent and rationale to have a central repository, where
everything is archived, instead of duplicating on each user PC all the past messages of
the group.

73=A0 Alberto=A0 I2PHD

--------------080100040300000201040902--