Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6D302380000BC; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 12:43:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SbDsv-0002Q8-D9 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 17:42:33 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SbDsu-0002Pz-Pm for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 17:42:32 +0100 Received: from out1.ip07ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.243]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SbDss-0002Xq-9m for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 17:42:31 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqMBAHmTy09OlnGb/2dsb2JhbAANNostqgsBAYIHAQEBAQNJBTcECwkIAwEBAQEJFggHCQMCAQIBNAkIEwYCAQEZBIdcA6hDgzoNiU6KMWAChg4DlRuSV4Fe X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,708,1330905600"; d="scan'208,217";a="37008140" Received: from host-78-150-113-155.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.7]) ([78.150.113.155]) by out1.ip07ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 03 Jun 2012 17:42:20 +0100 Message-ID: <4FCB93EC.3030907@psk31.plus.com> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 17:42:20 +0100 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4FCB225B.7020209@legal-medicine.de><000b01cd416c$9bef0a20$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <00d501cd4198$727929b0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> In-Reply-To: <00d501cd4198$727929b0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 03/06/2012 15:52, mal hamilton wrote: > Well John > When you get G3XBM in a email/posting some time back indicating that a > move to Yahoo would enable more control to ban persons like me whose > opinions and point of view differ from his, this is hardly > encouraging or democratic. > A sysop is necessary to ensure smooth operation of any organised group > but not CENSORSHIP or BANNING. > Come on Mal [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.243 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 14522a7d8bfffcae5e92e35059f18ae1 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: O.T.: Reflector status Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020400010600080202080008" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:470219584:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d61874fcb941f4db0 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020400010600080202080008 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/06/2012 15:52, mal hamilton wrote: > Well John > When you get G3XBM in a email/posting some time back indicating that a > move to Yahoo would enable more control to ban persons like me whose > opinions and point of view differ from his, this is hardly > encouraging or democratic. > A sysop is necessary to ensure smooth operation of any organised group > but not CENSORSHIP or BANNING. > Come on Mal I am sure Roger can stick up for himself but please don't resort to lies. Eddie > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* John Gould > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > *Sent:* Sunday, June 03, 2012 2:04 PM > *Subject:* Re: LF: Re: Re: O.T.: Reflector status > > Sorry guys, but I'm not monitoring this list much - rather busy on > a number of other fronts. However, as I have looked in to post > the thing about the poll saw the comments below. > > What is this restriction Mal, on posting to Yahoo! Groups - can > you elaborate as I am not aware of this. > > In answer to your comment Chris, I have said that I would arrange > the Sysop to create a re-direct to the new group, so that people > using the URL from one on the many published sources would be able > to find the group. > > I'm not trying to be difficult here, and really don't want to be > saddled with monitoring and administering two groups on the same > basic topic. > > 73 John, G3WKL > > On 3 June 2012 12:04, Chris > wrote: > > Mal, I agree. > Indeed, if the old site was to close I would suggest after a > year or two at least. I first discovered it through the RSGB > book 'LF Today' and probably many newcomers do the same. Also > there are probably links to this site from others which will > be around for years. > Vy 73 all, > Chris, G4AYT. > ----- Original Message ----- From: "mal hamilton" > > > To: > > Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 10:38 AM > Subject: LF: Re: O.T.: Reflector status > > > John > Keep Blacksheep reflector going as backup. I never had any > serious problems > with it. It is perfectly functional and useful with small > attachments and > for larger screen shots then Dropbox is suitable and has > worked well this > has been pointed out by others. > I cannot see any advantage with the Yahoo reflector except > I get more > adverts that I do not need. > Any mention of Underground LF/MF exploration are not > permitted on Yahoo > de mal/g3kev > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "pws" > > To: > > Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 8:37 AM > Subject: LF: O.T.: Reflector status > > > To John, G3WKL, > > Please do NOT shut down this reflector. > > 1. It's active in positive sense. > > 2. There are too many hams here who say > "no thanks!" to that advertisement driven > Brave New World were each posting will be > "googleable" for ever. Me too. > > That's the reason I unsubscribed from > some Yapoo-Groups recently. > > 73 Peter, df3lp > > > > > > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2425/5042 - Release Date: 06/03/12 > --------------020400010600080202080008 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/06/2012 15:52, mal hamilton wrote:
Well John
When you get G3XBM in a email/posting some time back indicating that a move to Yahoo would enable more control to ban persons like me whose opinions and point of view differ from his,  this is hardly encouraging or democratic.
A sysop is necessary to ensure smooth operation of any organised group but not CENSORSHIP or BANNING.

Come on Mal

I am sure Roger can stick up for himself but please don't resort to lies.

Eddie
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: John Gould
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: O.T.: Reflector status

Sorry guys, but I'm not monitoring this list much - rather busy on a number of other fronts.  However, as I have looked in to post the thing about the poll saw the comments below.  

What is this restriction Mal, on posting to Yahoo! Groups - can you elaborate as I am not aware of this.  

In answer to your comment Chris, I have said that I would arrange the Sysop to create a re-direct to the new group, so that people using the URL from one on the many published sources would be able to find the group.

I'm not trying to be difficult here, and really don't want to be saddled with monitoring and administering two groups on the same basic topic.

73 John, G3WKL

On 3 June 2012 12:04, Chris <c.ashby435@btinternet.com> wrote:
Mal, I agree.
Indeed, if the old site was to close I would suggest after a year or two at least. I first discovered it through the RSGB book 'LF Today' and probably many newcomers do the same. Also there are probably links to this site from others which will be around for years.
Vy 73 all,
Chris, G4AYT.
----- Original Message ----- From: "mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 10:38 AM
Subject: LF: Re: O.T.: Reflector status


John
Keep Blacksheep reflector going as backup. I never had any serious problems
with it. It is perfectly functional and useful with small attachments and
for larger screen shots then Dropbox is suitable and has worked well this
has been pointed out by others.
I cannot see any advantage with the Yahoo reflector except I get more
adverts that I do not need.
Any mention of Underground LF/MF exploration are not permitted on Yahoo
de mal/g3kev


----- Original Message -----
From: "pws" <pws@legal-medicine.de>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 8:37 AM
Subject: LF: O.T.: Reflector status


To John, G3WKL,

Please do NOT shut down this reflector.

1. It's active in positive sense.

2. There are too many hams here who say
"no thanks!" to that advertisement driven
Brave New World were each posting will be
"googleable" for ever. Me too.

That's the reason I unsubscribed from
some Yapoo-Groups recently.

73 Peter, df3lp






No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2425/5042 - Release Date: 06/03/12


--------------020400010600080202080008--