Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9852B38000082; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 08:10:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Sb9cS-0006fG-3b for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 13:09:16 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Sb9cR-0006f7-Nx for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 13:09:15 +0100 Received: from smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.33]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb9cQ-00014U-87 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 13:09:14 +0100 Received: from [10.0.0.170] (a80-101-33-132.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.101.33.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q53C98Ra083193 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 14:09:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from westberg@xs4all.nl) Message-ID: <4FCB53E3.1090507@xs4all.nl> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 14:09:07 +0200 From: Albert User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4FCB225B.7020209@legal-medicine.de> <1338719720.38541.YahooMailNeo@web171605.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <4FCB490B.1050900@legal-medicine.de> In-Reply-To: <4FCB490B.1050900@legal-medicine.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: All, No pros and cons, just a few words from an OM. I know the Reflector is slow and some times has small problems but I am used to it and see no major reason for this sudden change. 73, Albert PA0A [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [194.109.24.33 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 7b4dbd93955117b98f3a6ac4d7602f88 Subject: LF: BS Reflector status Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:346707520:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41184fcb542b553f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none All, No pros and cons, just a few words from an OM. I know the Reflector is slow and some times has small problems but I am used to it and see no major reason for this sudden change. 73, Albert PA0A