Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C533F3800008F; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 05:45:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Sb7M5-0005Sh-He for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 10:44:13 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Sb7M5-0005SY-2M for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 10:44:13 +0100 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb7M3-0000Yf-9m for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 10:44:11 +0100 Received: from [192.168.2.104] (p548D15DC.dip.t-dialin.net [84.141.21.220]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Ld3uy-1SAp0k0uJc-00ichM; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 11:44:10 +0200 Message-ID: <4FCB31E9.3030403@legal-medicine.de> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 11:44:09 +0200 From: pws User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111101 SUSE/3.1.16 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5804C62C151B4755A82A3AA96D1B3749@JimPC> In-Reply-To: <5804C62C151B4755A82A3AA96D1B3749@JimPC> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:Iyi6vPERhxOnI/Iw756Ul4wm03pF3nVjdfF7SiVvnWG a8MgoaTFnZ3r3NtS3/1oiEPXcxJ5ZyroSFFO87hy0uqAH+xvqb OvAei19AdS9uAZhogt+mBWYY3lQnduokewE+uNYVm9VF754MDz FrBh3VmnRdtVIGKcNj1rreeooUMfNleA1+Wp2CuCmZ5DzTcG7z e0RDS6XMX+QRiVJOboexJCGj13jaS2VHGZEWB2vk4FwNOTlinF Voi6GgK/0v+q7gXDbOdIssikPIT4ixL5bRk9Y9tz5ANY9HmaWr 0QN5t0BhJ7hXsu9fMAOJzpkCfePPpn09PehBHjWPDAADAToUU1 M2L/1uGrXaXhB0SZbEzpYwK+1dwYJlj3vWC07a8a8 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, > ... > At the moment, there are two RSGB LF Groups, with postings that overlap but > are not the same. This is a confusing situation leaving you wondering which > group to send replies to, etc. So I think one or the other needs to be > deleted, I guess you have to delete the one that will upset the fewest > people... > ... [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.227.126.187 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 4ead635eadbaebfaa92cfec77deb715d Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: Gettign rid of Black Sheep Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:398125856:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4ad24fcb32240473 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi, > ... > At the moment, there are two RSGB LF Groups, with postings that overlap but > are not the same. This is a confusing situation leaving you wondering which > group to send replies to, etc. So I think one or the other needs to be > deleted, I guess you have to delete the one that will upset the fewest > people... > ... That's not a problem here. That's a problem for those still subscribed here. So what? All those negative effects are due some misconfigurations of the "majordomo-server". I'm subscribed at 3 other based on this software suite. It never happens there. So, why not contacting the sysadmin, complaining about those problems? Peter, df3lp